Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 18.03.2013 20:55, schrieb James Antill:
>> This means users can't choose between the mysql's if they want to, so
>> if we do this it'd be much easier to just say "we'll only have a single
>> `mysql' in Fedora" and then we'd just have to add one more obsolete to
>> mariadb
On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 08:56:04 +0100, Honza Horak wrote:
On 03/18/2013 07:17 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
I'm not following the MySQL/mariadb packaging discussion in full
>detail - however, if we got to the point of discussing special yum
>plugins, wouldn't it be much simpler to
>
>* Modify the 10
On 03/18/2013 07:17 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
I'm not following the MySQL/mariadb packaging discussion in full
>detail - however, if we got to the point of discussing special yum
>plugins, wouldn't it be much simpler to
>
>* Modify the 10 packages that require mysql-server, the 19 packages
>that
Am 18.03.2013 20:55, schrieb James Antill:
> This means users can't choose between the mysql's if they want to, so
> if we do this it'd be much easier to just say "we'll only have a single
> `mysql' in Fedora" and then we'd just have to add one more obsolete to
> mariadb and everything works per
On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 18:42 +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
> > In case of MySQL/mariadb (just for demonstration) the config file would
> > contain say:
> > MySQL +1
> > mariadb -1
> > which would tell yum to prioritize M
On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 18:30 +0100, Honza Horak wrote:
> I'd like to discuss the topic about virtual provides in a general
> context (not related to MySQL->MariaDB replacement) to find out what
> actually is a consensus in Fedora about an issue when "two packages
> provide the same (not only) vir
Miloslav Trmač (m...@volny.cz) said:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
> > In case of MySQL/mariadb (just for demonstration) the config file would
> > contain say:
> > MySQL +1
> > mariadb -1
> > which would tell yum to prioritize MySQL.
> >
> > I'm s
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
> In case of MySQL/mariadb (just for demonstration) the config file would
> contain say:
> MySQL +1
> mariadb -1
> which would tell yum to prioritize MySQL.
>
> I'm sure that there are several other use cases for such ut
I'd like to discuss the topic about virtual provides in a general
context (not related to MySQL->MariaDB replacement) to find out what
actually is a consensus in Fedora about an issue when "two packages
provide the same (not only) virtual symbol" -- particularly what package
maintainers could/s
