Re: What's the reason for not accepting karma from Bodhi submitter

2012-08-20 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 05:35:07PM +0200, Björn Persson wrote: > Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > If I give negative karma, that's because I tested the update and > > found it didn't work. > > Why would you do that instead of retracting the update? Actually because I'd forgot you could do that. Yes

Re: What's the reason for not accepting karma from Bodhi submitter

2012-08-20 Thread Björn Persson
Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > If I give negative karma, that's because I tested the update and > found it didn't work. Why would you do that instead of retracting the update? Björn Persson -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: What's the reason for not accepting karma from Bodhi submitter

2012-08-20 Thread Andre Robatino
Björn Persson xn--rombobjrn-67a.se> writes: > If Bodhi were to be designed for proxy karma it should allow the > maintainer unlimited karma points so that they could act as a proxy for > more than one user. Allowing one proxy karma point but not more than one > would be a quite arbitrary restrict

Re: What's the reason for not accepting karma from Bodhi submitter

2012-08-20 Thread Jon Ciesla
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Peter Jones wrote: > On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 12:37 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qemu-1.2-0.3.20120806git3e430569.fc18 >> >> I built the package, and I tested it. Yet doing the right thing means >> my karma doesn't count

Re: What's the reason for not accepting karma from Bodhi submitter

2012-08-20 Thread Peter Jones
On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 12:37 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qemu-1.2-0.3.20120806git3e430569.fc18 > > I built the package, and I tested it. Yet doing the right thing means > my karma doesn't count ... > > IMO this change makes the karma system (even) wo

Re: What's the reason for not accepting karma from Bodhi submitter

2012-08-20 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 02:23:26PM +0200, Julian Leyh wrote: > If you submit it, it means you already tested and approved it. Karma > from you gives no new (quality) information about the package. It > should be tested by independent people. Not at all. I might not be able to test the update, eg.

Re: What's the reason for not accepting karma from Bodhi submitter

2012-08-20 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 02:17:59PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 20.8.2012 13:37, Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a): > >https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qemu-1.2-0.3.20120806git3e430569.fc18 > > > >I built the package, and I tested it. Yet doing the right thing means > >my karma doesn't count

Re: What's the reason for not accepting karma from Bodhi submitter

2012-08-20 Thread Björn Persson
Stephen Gallagher wrote: > Furthermore, a not-inconsequential consideration is proxy-karma. For > example, I have in the past occasionally given karma +1 (and -1) on my > own packages from users that did not have Fedora accounts (or couldn't > manage to defeat the ogre that is FAS's CAPTCHA). If B

Re: What's the reason for not accepting karma from Bodhi submitter

2012-08-20 Thread Julian Leyh
2012/8/20 Andre Robatino : > Julian Leyh vgai.de> writes: > >> >> 2012/8/20 Richard W.M. Jones redhat.com>: >> > >> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qemu-1.2-0.3.20120806git3e430569.fc18 >> > >> > I built the package, and I tested it. Yet doing the right thing means >> > my karma doesn'

Re: What's the reason for not accepting karma from Bodhi submitter

2012-08-20 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
- Original Message - > Julian Leyh vgai.de> writes: > > > > > 2012/8/20 Richard W.M. Jones redhat.com>: > > > > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qemu-1.2-0.3.20120806git3e430569.fc18 > > > > > > I built the package, and I tested it. Yet doing the right thing > > > means > >

Re: What's the reason for not accepting karma from Bodhi submitter

2012-08-20 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 12:28 +, Andre Robatino wrote: > Julian Leyh vgai.de> writes: > > > > > 2012/8/20 Richard W.M. Jones redhat.com>: > > > > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qemu-1.2-0.3.20120806git3e430569.fc18 > > > > > > I built the package, and I tested it. Yet doing the

Re: What's the reason for not accepting karma from Bodhi submitter

2012-08-20 Thread Andre Robatino
Julian Leyh vgai.de> writes: > > 2012/8/20 Richard W.M. Jones redhat.com>: > > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qemu-1.2-0.3.20120806git3e430569.fc18 > > > > I built the package, and I tested it. Yet doing the right thing means > > my karma doesn't count ... > > > > IMO this change

Re: What's the reason for not accepting karma from Bodhi submitter

2012-08-20 Thread Julian Leyh
2012/8/20 Richard W.M. Jones : > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qemu-1.2-0.3.20120806git3e430569.fc18 > > I built the package, and I tested it. Yet doing the right thing means > my karma doesn't count ... > > IMO this change makes the karma system (even) worse than before. > > Rich. If

Re: What's the reason for not accepting karma from Bodhi submitter

2012-08-20 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 20.8.2012 13:37, Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a): https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qemu-1.2-0.3.20120806git3e430569.fc18 I built the package, and I tested it. Yet doing the right thing means my karma doesn't count ... IMO this change makes the karma system (even) worse than before. Ri

What's the reason for not accepting karma from Bodhi submitter

2012-08-20 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qemu-1.2-0.3.20120806git3e430569.fc18 I built the package, and I tested it. Yet doing the right thing means my karma doesn't count ... IMO this change makes the karma system (even) worse than before. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Ha