On Mon, 2015-12-28 at 14:24 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> This mail is in regards to WSA-2015-0002: http://webkitgtk.org/securi
> ty
> /WSA-2015-0002.html
>
> In short, we have by my count:
>
> * Zero CVEs affecting the webkitgtk4 package in F23
> * 40 CVEs affecting the webkitgtk4 package in
Hi,
On Sat, 2016-01-02 at 16:16 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> Looking over the list, most of the impacted software we could live
> without, or stands a good chance of being ported in time. Evolution is
> mostly ported upstream, as is Midori.
Evolution's WebKit 2 port is targeted to be finishe
On Sat, 2016-01-02 at 14:31 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> A deadline might help motivate some upstream projects to move to
> webkitgtk4 I suppose. I'm not sure we can say the f25 branch point,
> because we don't really yet know what that date exactly is. ;(
>
> Perhaps we pick some date after the p
On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 14:24:29 -0600
Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This mail is in regards to
> WSA-2015-0002: http://webkitgtk.org/security /WSA-2015-0002.html
>
> In short, we have by my count:
>
> * Zero CVEs affecting the webkitgtk4 package in F23
> * 40 CVEs affecting the webkitgtk4 pa
Hi,
This mail is in regards to WSA-2015-0002: http://webkitgtk.org/security
/WSA-2015-0002.html
In short, we have by my count:
* Zero CVEs affecting the webkitgtk4 package in F23
* 40 CVEs affecting the webkitgtk4 package in F22
* 129 CVEs affecting the webkitgtk and webkitgtk3 packages in F22/F
