On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 13:50:42 -
"Christian Stadelmann" wrote:
> I think this works now. At least the fedora-easy-karma bug is
> resolved and `dnf repoquery --recommends fedora-easy-karma` lists
> python2-dnf. Thank you!
>
> I've added a comment in
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FED
I think this works now. At least the fedora-easy-karma bug is resolved and `dnf
repoquery --recommends fedora-easy-karma` lists python2-dnf. Thank you!
I've added a comment in
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3495b9a120 too.
___
deve
On Sun, 11 Sep 2016 21:54:43 -
"Christian Stadelmann" wrote:
> Still broken.
>
> Steps to reproduce:
> 0. have updates-testing enabled
> 1. do not have python2-dnf installed
> 2. try to install fedora-easy-karma
> 3. have a look at the transaction
>
> What happens:
> Transaction doesn't in
Still broken.
Steps to reproduce:
0. have updates-testing enabled
1. do not have python2-dnf installed
2. try to install fedora-easy-karma
3. have a look at the transaction
What happens:
Transaction doesn't include python2-dnf
What should happen:
Transaction should include python2-dnf
Addition
ok. With excellent help from walters we got the atomic updates composes
working again and everything has now pushed out. (Although
fedora-24-updates-testing just pushed out so it will take it a few to
mirror).
So, all the updates/updates-testing repos should now have weak deps.
Can folks retest
On Thu, 08 Sep 2016 12:26:36 -
"Christian Stadelmann" wrote:
> Still not working.
>
> The only file from updates-testing repo metadata¹ providing
> "recommends" XML tags is the
> 2b1dda391308bf7395f9890774b4d2d0692b615c2ad6a73fa378080d32c0c531-primary.xml
> file, but it just has those tags f
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 7:21 PM, Christian Stadelmann
wrote:
> So all packages have to be rebuilt to make their weak dependencies go into
> repo metadata? This was not obvious from the first posting by Kevin Fenzi
> and probably should go into a separate post here and on devel-announce too.
I o
So all packages have to be rebuilt to make their weak dependencies go into repo
metadata? This was not obvious from the first posting by Kevin Fenzi and
probably should go into a separate post here and on devel-announce too.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedor
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 5:56 PM, Christian Stadelmann
wrote:
> Still not working.
>
> The only file from updates-testing repo metadata¹ providing "recommends" XML
> tags is the
> 2b1dda391308bf7395f9890774b4d2d0692b615c2ad6a73fa378080d32c0c531-primary.xml
> file, but it just has those tags for 6
Still not working.
The only file from updates-testing repo metadata¹ providing "recommends" XML
tags is the
2b1dda391308bf7395f9890774b4d2d0692b615c2ad6a73fa378080d32c0c531-primary.xml
file, but it just has those tags for 6 packages.
¹ /var/cache/dnf/updates-testing-648243a4cddd356c
--
devel m
On Tue, 06 Sep 2016 18:59:51 -
"Christian Stadelmann" wrote:
> I think it is still broken somewhere. I uninstalled
> fedora-easy-karma, which makes use of weak deps, and tried to
> reinstall it. I'm not seeing any suggested/weak deps.
>
> See https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-20
I think it is still broken somewhere. I uninstalled fedora-easy-karma, which
makes use of weak deps, and tried to reinstall it. I'm not seeing any
suggested/weak deps.
See https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3495b9a120
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://l
Greetings.
Just FYI, we are now pushing updates using a Fedora 24 instance.
Because this instance has an rpm that understands weak deps, they are
now in the repodata.
Everything seems to be working, but keep an eye out for any odd
behavior and let us know if you see something.
kevin
pgpph81
13 matches
Mail list logo
