On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 04:03:49PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > >> So, there's a meta-point here: we currently 'require' Beta releases to
> > >> boot as guests on Xen hosts:
> > >>
> > >> "The release must boot successfully as a virtual guest in a situation
> > >> where the virtual host
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 03:08:41PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 12:47:57PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 06:59:57PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 03:46:31PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> > > > On
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 06:59:57PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 03:46:31PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> > On 09/21/2011 01:03 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > So, there's a meta-point here: we currently 'require' Beta releases to
> > boot as gue
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 12:14 +0300, Myroslav Opyr wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> What Xen implementation is considered "supported" for FC16 DomU? I'm
> asking because on "Xen implementation" we were testing yesterday FC16
> DomU installation failed compared to FC15 DomU success on the very
> same Dom0. Are fa
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:08:40PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:14:23PM +0300, Myroslav Opyr wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > What Xen implementation is considered "supported" for FC16 DomU?
>
> Any commonly available upstream Xen releases.
>
> Fedora itself
> (ie. https:/
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:14:23PM +0300, Myroslav Opyr wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What Xen implementation is considered "supported" for FC16 DomU?
Any commonly available upstream Xen releases.
Fedora itself
(ie. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/XenPvopsDom0).
Also Xen in RHEL 5, although that's m
Hi,
What Xen implementation is considered "supported" for FC16 DomU? I'm asking
because on "Xen implementation" we were testing yesterday FC16 DomU
installation failed compared to FC15 DomU success on the very same Dom0. Are
failures like we've encountered candidates for bugreports?
Is there a pl
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 10:10 -0500, W. Michael Petullo wrote:
> >> There are known bugs in FC15/FC16 that have been filled some time ago that
> >> folks will sadly run into: 728775, 658387 and 668063
> >>
> >> Fortunatly the bugs have patches attached and the files to be modified are
> >> shell s
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 05:45:39PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> >
> > > >([3]https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/219). It takes time
> > > > for us
> > > >to setup test environment, and would be good to have some info in
> > > > advance.
> >
Ok, so some basic steps to test Xen
>> There are known bugs in FC15/FC16 that have been filled some time ago that
>> folks will sadly run into: 728775, 658387 and 668063
>>
>> Fortunatly the bugs have patches attached and the files to be modified are
>> shell scripts.
> Yep, links here:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 10:25:23AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 02:25:52PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 01:33:54AM +0300, Myroslav Opyr wrote:
> > >Hi,
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > >Virtualization Test day is expected to be on Septem
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 01:33:54AM +0300, Myroslav Opyr wrote:
>Hi,
Hello,
>Virtualization Test day is expected to be on September 15th this year
>([1]https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/232).
>
So that's tomorrow!
Luckily Xen Hackathon (@Munich) event is just happening,
so ho
Hi,
Virtualization Test day is expected to be on September 15th this year (
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/232).
We are willing to help test
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/XenPvopsDom0 but find too little
information about test methods (
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticke
13 matches
Mail list logo
