Re: Very strange compiler/linker related build failures in rawhide

2020-08-20 Thread Vít Ondruch
Hi Jeff, Dne 27. 07. 20 v 14:28 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > Dne 27. 07. 20 v 12:25 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): >> Dne 24. 07. 20 v 21:01 Jeff Law napsal(a): >>> On Fri, 2020-07-24 at 20:52 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: The LTO break Ruby on various platforms. https://koji.fedoraproject.or

Re: Very strange compiler/linker related build failures in rawhide

2020-07-27 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 27. 07. 20 v 12:25 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > Dne 24. 07. 20 v 21:01 Jeff Law napsal(a): >> On Fri, 2020-07-24 at 20:52 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: >>> The LTO break Ruby on various platforms. >>> >>> >>> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=47582573 >>> >>> vs >>> >>> https://koji.

Re: Very strange compiler/linker related build failures in rawhide

2020-07-27 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 24. 07. 20 v 21:01 Jeff Law napsal(a): > On Fri, 2020-07-24 at 20:52 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> The LTO break Ruby on various platforms. >> >> >> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=47582573 >> >> vs >> >> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=47621733 >> >> (No

Re: Very strange compiler/linker related build failures in rawhide

2020-07-27 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Fri, 2020-07-24 at 10:40 -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > On Fri, 2020-07-24 at 17:59 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 5:48 PM Jeff Law wrote: > > > On Fri, 2020-07-24 at 17:44 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 5:11 PM Jeff Law > > > > wrote: > > Lo

Re: Very strange compiler/linker related build failures in rawhide

2020-07-24 Thread Jeff Law
On Fri, 2020-07-24 at 15:00 -0600, Jerry James wrote: > On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 2:49 PM Eric Sandeen wrote: > > Hm, is this related? (libtool segfault building xfsprogs) > > > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/9149/47779149/build.log > > > > /bin/sh ../libtool --quiet --tag=CC --

Re: Very strange compiler/linker related build failures in rawhide

2020-07-24 Thread Jerry James
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 2:49 PM Eric Sandeen wrote: > Hm, is this related? (libtool segfault building xfsprogs) > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/9149/47779149/build.log > > /bin/sh ../libtool --quiet --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -Wl,-z,relro > -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-z,now -specs=/us

Re: Very strange compiler/linker related build failures in rawhide

2020-07-24 Thread Eric Sandeen
On 7/24/20 1:31 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm starting to see various very strange kinds of build failures in > rawhide, that seem to have started with either of these updates (or a > combination of them): > > - annobin 9.21-1.fc33 → 9.22-1.fc33 > - binutils 2.34.0-6.fc33 → 2.34.0-

Re: Very strange compiler/linker related build failures in rawhide

2020-07-24 Thread Jeff Law
On Fri, 2020-07-24 at 20:52 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > The LTO break Ruby on various platforms. > > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=47582573 > > vs > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=47621733 > > (Note these are my experimental builds testing single

Re: Very strange compiler/linker related build failures in rawhide

2020-07-24 Thread Vít Ondruch
The LTO break Ruby on various platforms. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=47582573 vs https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=47621733 (Note these are my experimental builds testing single test case). The only difference is redhat-rpm-config 162-1.fc33 => 163-1

Re: Very strange compiler/linker related build failures in rawhide

2020-07-24 Thread Dominique Martinet
Jeff Law wrote on Fri, Jul 24, 2020: > > Looks like somebody already did that and attached the .ii file to the RHBZ. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859588 > > Unfortunately neither Marek nor I can reproduce with the compilers we've > tested. > Is it possible the OOM killer is ki

Re: Very strange compiler/linker related build failures in rawhide

2020-07-24 Thread Jeff Law
On Fri, 2020-07-24 at 17:59 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 5:48 PM Jeff Law wrote: > > On Fri, 2020-07-24 at 17:44 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 5:11 PM Jeff Law wrote: > > > > > One error I've seen in libreoffice is a gcc / annobin segfault:

Re: Very strange compiler/linker related build failures in rawhide

2020-07-24 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 5:48 PM Jeff Law wrote: > > On Fri, 2020-07-24 at 17:44 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 5:11 PM Jeff Law wrote: > > > > One error I've seen in libreoffice is a gcc / annobin segfault: > > > > > > > > [build CXX] vcl/unx/gtk3/gtk3gtkinst.cxx > > >

Re: Very strange compiler/linker related build failures in rawhide

2020-07-24 Thread Jeff Law
On Fri, 2020-07-24 at 17:44 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 5:11 PM Jeff Law wrote: > > > One error I've seen in libreoffice is a gcc / annobin segfault: > > > > > > [build CXX] vcl/unx/gtk3/gtk3gtkinst.cxx > > > *** WARNING *** there are active plugins, do not report this

Re: Very strange compiler/linker related build failures in rawhide

2020-07-24 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 5:11 PM Jeff Law wrote: > > One error I've seen in libreoffice is a gcc / annobin segfault: > > > > [build CXX] vcl/unx/gtk3/gtk3gtkinst.cxx > > *** WARNING *** there are active plugins, do not report this as a bug > > unless you can reproduce it without enabling any plugin

Re: Very strange compiler/linker related build failures in rawhide

2020-07-24 Thread Jeff Law
On Fri, 2020-07-24 at 10:31 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm starting to see various very strange kinds of build failures in > rawhide, that seem to have started with either of these updates (or a > combination of them): > > - annobin 9.21-1.fc33 → 9.22-1.fc33 > - binutils 2.34.0-6

Re: Very strange compiler/linker related build failures in rawhide

2020-07-24 Thread Petr Pisar
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 10:31:11AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > Other failures I've seen end up with linker failures, line these, from > postgresql: > > ld: undefined reference to `postgresql_subtrans__checkpoint__start_semaphore' > . -- Pet

Re: Very strange compiler/linker related build failures in rawhide

2020-07-24 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 11:23 AM Hans de Goede wrote: > > Hi, > > On 7/24/20 10:31 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I'm starting to see various very strange kinds of build failures in > > rawhide, that seem to have started with either of these updates (or a > > combination of them):

Re: Very strange compiler/linker related build failures in rawhide

2020-07-24 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 7/24/20 10:31 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote: Hi all, I'm starting to see various very strange kinds of build failures in rawhide, that seem to have started with either of these updates (or a combination of them): - annobin 9.21-1.fc33 → 9.22-1.fc33 - binutils 2.34.0-6.fc33 → 2.34.0-7.fc33 -

Re: Very strange compiler/linker related build failures in rawhide

2020-07-24 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 10:45 AM Stephan Bergmann wrote: > > Does somebody have a clue what's going on here? It's currently > > blocking rawhide composes because libreoffice fails to build / > > install. > > (The LibreOffice build failure is tracked at >

Re: Very strange compiler/linker related build failures in rawhide

2020-07-24 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 24/07/2020 10:31, Fabio Valentini wrote: Other errors look like this one from switchboard-plug-onlineaccounts: src/libonline-accounts.so.p/Authentification/Server.c: In function ‘online_accounts_server_on_bus_acquired’: src/libonline-accounts.so.p/Authentification/Server.c:498:2: error: funct

Very strange compiler/linker related build failures in rawhide

2020-07-24 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi all, I'm starting to see various very strange kinds of build failures in rawhide, that seem to have started with either of these updates (or a combination of them): - annobin 9.21-1.fc33 → 9.22-1.fc33 - binutils 2.34.0-6.fc33 → 2.34.0-7.fc33 - elfutils 0.179-2.fc33 → 0.180-2.fc33 - glibc 2.31.