On 09/09/16 14:39, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 8:13 AM, Alec Leamas wrote:
Dear list,
There is an ongoing thread in debian-devel on their Standards-Version usage.
Reading this, it strikes me that Fedora lacks this info.
It wouldn't be that difficult to pull it out of the wi
W dniu 09.09.2016 o 14:25, gil pisze:
>> Could we learn anything from this? Fedora is not a rolling
>> distribution, but the guidelines are. Would it be a good idea to
>> actually provide versions of the guidelines? To track the last version
>> checked in the packages?
>>
>> If not for anything els
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 8:13 AM, Alec Leamas wrote:
> Dear list,
>
>
> There is an ongoing thread in debian-devel on their Standards-Version usage.
> Reading this, it strikes me that Fedora lacks this info.
>
> The basic package lifecycle is that it is reviewed to current standards, and
> after tha
Il 09/09/2016 14:13, Alec Leamas ha scritto:
Dear list,
There is an ongoing thread in debian-devel on their Standards-Version
usage. Reading this, it strikes me that Fedora lacks this info.
The basic package lifecycle is that it is reviewed to current
standards, and after that start laggi
Dear list,
There is an ongoing thread in debian-devel on their Standards-Version
usage. Reading this, it strikes me that Fedora lacks this info.
The basic package lifecycle is that it is reviewed to current standards,
and after that start lagging from the actual standards. To which extent
d
