On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:07:51 +0100
Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there have been quite a few unresponsive maintainers processes in past
> few months + there are people that don't respond to emails in timely
> fashion.
>
> I'd like to have a system where anyone can see which maintainers a
On 12/11/2010 03:33 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
>> I know we have [1], but as you can see, there are 4 people listed on
>> that page. That leads me to believe two things:
>> 1. Most people don't know the page exists (I didn't until tibbs
>> pointed it out to me)
>> 2
Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> I know we have [1], but as you can see, there are 4 people listed on
> that page. That leads me to believe two things:
> 1. Most people don't know the page exists (I didn't until tibbs
> pointed it out to me)
> 2. It's cumbersome to edit wiki for things like this
Am Mittwoch, den 08.12.2010, 16:07 +0100 schrieb Stanislav Ochotnicky:
> Hi,
>
> there have been quite a few unresponsive maintainers processes in past
> few months + there are people that don't respond to emails in timely
> fashion.
>
> I'd like to have a system where anyone can see which mainta
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 16:07 +0100, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> Obviously not every fedora maintainer has shell account so exact
> replica
> of [2] wouldn't work, but I was thinking some nicer interface could be
> provided. Maybe simple email with special subject line:
> > FAS-name - $messsage
>
Hi,
there have been quite a few unresponsive maintainers processes in past
few months + there are people that don't respond to emails in timely
fashion.
I'd like to have a system where anyone can see which maintainers are not
available at the moment and approximate time of return to "normal". It
