I would have just made the lib a subproject but the version is higher than
that of the binary/overall version. Maybe the best thing to do is just to
go ahead and bite the bullet and bump the Epoch and do it that way.
Thanks,
Richard
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.
On Wed, 3 Feb 2016 07:32:33 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Christian Stadelmann wrote:
>
> > Is there any reason why two packages provide tsqllib and tsqllib-devel?
> > See https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/s?search=trustedqsl and the
> > related .spec files
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 4:38 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 04:11:46PM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> >I was notified by a user that a newer version of trustedqsl was
> available
> >so I looked into why I wasn't notified.
> >For some reason it still thinks 1.13 i
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Christian Stadelmann <
genodeft...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Is there any reason why two packages provide tsqllib and tsqllib-devel?
> See https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/s?search=trustedqsl and the
> related .spec files in git repos?
They used to be sup
On Wed, 3 Feb 2016 07:34:06 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 10:45:04PM -, Christian Stadelmann wrote:
> > Is there any reason why two packages provide tsqllib and tsqllib-devel? See
> > https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/s?search=trustedqsl and the related
> >
On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 10:45:04PM -, Christian Stadelmann wrote:
> Is there any reason why two packages provide tsqllib and tsqllib-devel? See
> https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/s?search=trustedqsl and the related
> .spec files in git repos?
Looks like one is using a tarball named tq
Is there any reason why two packages provide tsqllib and tsqllib-devel? See
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/s?search=trustedqsl and the related
.spec files in git repos?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraprojec
On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 04:11:46PM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
>I was notified by a user that a newer version of trustedqsl was available
>so I looked into why I wasn't notified.
>For some reason it still thinks 1.13 is the current version when it is
>2.2:
>https://release-monito
I was notified by a user that a newer version of trustedqsl was available
so I looked into why I wasn't notified.
For some reason it still thinks 1.13 is the current version when it is 2.2:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/4998/
I've tried tweaking things but can't seem to find the magic f
