On 20-10-2023 15:52, Ben Beasley wrote:
For next time, this seems to work for me:
for p in petsc{,64,-openmpi,-mpich} libpetsc.so; do repoquery -q
--repo=rawhide{,-source} --whatrequires "$p"; done | sort -u
An alternative to above, using gotmax23's excellent fedrq [1], you'd get
the same re
Just a heads-up that whichever process you have been using to determine
the list of affected dependent packages has been missing getdp; see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2245240 and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189695. I just rebuilt
getdp in Rawhide, so there’s no
Hi all.
In 1 week, i will upgrade Sundials and PETSc to their related newer
versions:
PETSc-3.20.0
https://petsc.org/release/changes/320/
sundials-6.6.1
https://github.com/LLNL/sundials/releases
Following packages will be rebuilt:
bout++
freefem++
octave
cantera
dolfin
Regards.
--
---
Anto
