On Sun, 2024-09-29 at 09:21 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 02:33:21PM GMT, Simone Caronni wrote:
> > > xorg-x11-server is ready, I just fixed last issue which was with
> > > Nouveau drive
> > >
> > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-nouveau/-/merge_request
On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 06:03:01PM GMT, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Sept 2024 at 17:21, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 02:33:21PM GMT, Simone Caronni wrote:
> > > > xorg-x11-server is ready, I just fixed last issue which was with
> > > > Nouveau drive
> > > >
> > > > htt
On Sun, 29 Sept 2024 at 17:21, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 02:33:21PM GMT, Simone Caronni wrote:
> > > xorg-x11-server is ready, I just fixed last issue which was with
> > > Nouveau drive
> > >
> > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-nouveau/-/merge_requests/
On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 02:33:21PM GMT, Simone Caronni wrote:
> > xorg-x11-server is ready, I just fixed last issue which was with
> > Nouveau drive
> >
> > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-nouveau/-/merge_requests/10
>
>
> As mentioned in the thread, I'll proceed. Thanks.
J
> xorg-x11-server is ready, I just fixed last issue which was with
> Nouveau drive
>
> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-nouveau/-/merge_requests/10
As mentioned in the thread, I'll proceed. Thanks.
--
You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight
On Fri, 2024-09-06 at 14:57 +0200, Simone Caronni wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2024 at 2:50 PM Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> > I'd like to understand, so what in "X server 21.1" broke ? from
> > this
> > thread [1] only 340xx driver stopped to work , 390xx supports xorg-
> > 21.1
>
> Both these branches are
On Fri, Sep 6, 2024 at 2:50 PM Sérgio Basto wrote:
> I'd like to understand, so what in "X server 21.1" broke ? from this
> thread [1] only 340xx driver stopped to work , 390xx supports xorg-21.1
>
Both these branches are dead, 340 in 2019 and 390 in 2022.
--
You cannot discover new oceans unl
On Fri, 2024-09-06 at 13:58 +0200, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2024 at 1:47 PM Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2024-09-05 at 18:54 +0200, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > My understanding is the reason we hadn't was because of the
> > > NVIDIA
> > > binary driver. For the desktops that still
On Fri, Sep 6, 2024 at 1:47 PM Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2024-09-05 at 18:54 +0200, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > My understanding is the reason we hadn't was because of the NVIDIA
> > binary driver. For the desktops that still use X11 and the X11 DDX
> > instead of the modesetting driver, that coul
On Thu, 2024-09-05 at 18:54 +0200, Neal Gompa wrote:
> My understanding is the reason we hadn't was because of the NVIDIA
> binary driver. For the desktops that still use X11 and the X11 DDX
> instead of the modesetting driver, that could be a problem if the ABI
> broke.
Here it says, some NVIDIA
It was removed from the kernel not xorg.
https://www.phoronix.com/news/Linux-Drop-Old-UMS-DRM-Infra
Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-09-05 at 22:41 +, Leigh Scott wrote:
> > Neal Gompa wrote:
> > My understanding is the reason we hadn't was because of the
> > NVIDIA
> > binary driver.
> > I
Hi Sérgio
On Fri, Sep 6, 2024 at 5:17 AM Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-09-05 at 22:41 +, Leigh Scott wrote:
> > Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > > My understanding is the reason we hadn't was because of the
> > > > NVIDIA
> > > binary driver.
> >
> > It doesn't matter if it breaks 340xx, it's i
On Thu, 2024-09-05 at 22:41 +, Leigh Scott wrote:
> Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > My understanding is the reason we hadn't was because of the
> > > NVIDIA
> > binary driver.
>
> It doesn't matter if it breaks 340xx, it's in a poor state due to
> legacy drm removal.
X11 DDX was remove because, IIR
Neal Gompa wrote:
> > My understanding is the reason we hadn't was because of the NVIDIA
> binary driver.
It doesn't matter if it breaks 340xx, it's in a poor state due to legacy drm
removal.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 6:55 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> My understanding is the reason we hadn't was because of the NVIDIA
> binary driver. For the desktops that still use X11 and the X11 DDX
> instead of the modesetting driver, that could be a problem if the ABI
> broke.
>
I think this is no longer
On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 5:30 PM Simone Caronni wrote:
>
> Hi Sergio,
>
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 5:26 PM Sérgio Basto wrote:
>>
>> I already did the PR
>>
>> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xorg-x11-server/pull-request/21
>>
>> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sergiomb/xorg-x11-server/bui
Hi Sergio,
On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 5:26 PM Sérgio Basto wrote:
> I already did the PR
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xorg-x11-server/pull-request/21
>
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sergiomb/xorg-x11-server/builds/
Yes, that's the merge request I was mentioning.
Thanks,
--Si
On Thu, 2024-09-05 at 16:54 +0200, Simone Caronni wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've noticed that we're really behind on xorg-x11-server releases
> (almost 3 years!) and that by rebasing we would drop tons of
> patches that have already been upstreamed during this time.
>
> No one that is listed in t
Hi Simone,
On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 5:07 PM Simone Caronni wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've noticed that we're really behind on xorg-x11-server releases (almost
> 3 years!) and that by rebasing we would drop tons of patches that have
> already been upstreamed during this time.
>
> No one that is lis
On 9/5/24 10:54 AM, Simone Caronni wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've noticed that we're really behind on xorg-x11-server releases (almost 3
years!) and that by rebasing we would drop tons of patches that have already
been upstreamed during this time.
No one that is listed in the maintainer list of tha
Hi everyone,
I've noticed that we're really behind on xorg-x11-server releases (almost 3
years!) and that by rebasing we would drop tons of patches that have
already been upstreamed during this time.
No one that is listed in the maintainer list of that package seems to have
been active on it for
21 matches
Mail list logo
