Dne 13. 03. 19 v 11:49 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
>
> Ok, so the process which worked for me was:
>
>
> ~~~
>
> $ sudo dnf update
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/fedora-repos/30/0.5/data/signed/cfc659b9/noarch/fedora-{gpg-keys,repos{,-rawhide}}-30-0.5.noarch.rpm
>
>
> $ sudo dnf update -
On 3/13/19 3:33 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 12. 03. 19 v 19:49 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
>> We need to revamp this entirely, and as luck would have it, we have a plan:
>>
>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/5UVGSBRLX352A4S2CBZ2CGBXPAGQTYKB/
>
> I
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019, at 2:50 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/5UVGSBRLX352A4S2CBZ2CGBXPAGQTYKB/
>
> How does this plan work with silverblue? Not sure... could use some
> input from them.
It's the same model for Fedora
Ok, so the process which worked for me was:
~~~
$ sudo dnf update
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/fedora-repos/30/0.5/data/signed/cfc659b9/noarch/fedora-{gpg-keys,repos{,-rawhide}}-30-0.5.noarch.rpm
$ sudo dnf update --enablerepo=rawhide fedora-gpg-keys --release 31
~~~
But what
Dne 12. 03. 19 v 19:49 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
> We need to revamp this entirely, and as luck would have it, we have a plan:
>
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/5UVGSBRLX352A4S2CBZ2CGBXPAGQTYKB/
I am afraid that this will not help in this situatio
On 11/03/19 18:05 +0100, Jan Pokorný wrote:
> On 11/03/19 15:01 +0100, Jan Pokorný wrote:
>> On 11/03/19 12:31 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>> Can somebody please enlighten me, how to update Rawhide after branching
>>> and not using --nogpgcheck?
>>
>> Good question; have observed this over several
On 3/12/19 4:14 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 11. 03. 19 v 19:29 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
>> On 3/11/19 4:31 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Can somebody please enlighten me, how to update Rawhide after branching
>>> and not using --nogpgcheck?
>> Can you expand on the case here?
>>
>> What
On 3/11/19 11:45 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> I'm having a similar problem, but with Silverblue / rawhide.
>
> I installed the system when rawhide was still f30, but now I can't run
> "rpm-ostree upgrade" anymore, due to this error:
>
> Enabled rpm-md repositories: rawhide
> Updating
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 1:55 PM Colin Walters wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2019, at 2:46 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> > I'm having a similar problem, but with Silverblue / rawhide.
> >
> > I installed the system when rawhide was still f30, but now I can't run
> > "rpm-ostree upgrade" anymore,
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019, at 2:46 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> I'm having a similar problem, but with Silverblue / rawhide.
>
> I installed the system when rawhide was still f30, but now I can't run
> "rpm-ostree upgrade" anymore, due to this error:
>
> Enabled rpm-md repositories: rawhide
>
Dne 12. 03. 19 v 12:46 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
>
>
> Dne 12. 03. 19 v 12:14 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
>> Dne 11. 03. 19 v 19:29 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
>>> On 3/11/19 4:31 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hi,
Can somebody please enlighten me, how to update Rawhide after branching
and not usin
Dne 12. 03. 19 v 12:14 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> Dne 11. 03. 19 v 19:29 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
>> On 3/11/19 4:31 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Can somebody please enlighten me, how to update Rawhide after branching
>>> and not using --nogpgcheck?
>> Can you expand on the case here?
>>
>>
Dne 11. 03. 19 v 19:29 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
> On 3/11/19 4:31 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Can somebody please enlighten me, how to update Rawhide after branching
>> and not using --nogpgcheck?
> Can you expand on the case here?
>
> What should happen is:
>
> * branching
> * f30 repos get
Hi,
I suspect it's a chicken and egg issue:
* Look at /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-rawhide.repo
* You can see the line:
gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-$releasever-$basearch
* But "$releasever" is determined by the version of "fedora-release" package.
* So dnf, tries t
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 7:30 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 3/11/19 4:31 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Can somebody please enlighten me, how to update Rawhide after branching
> > and not using --nogpgcheck?
>
> Can you expand on the case here?
>
> What should happen is:
>
> * branching
> * f
On 3/11/19 4:31 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can somebody please enlighten me, how to update Rawhide after branching
> and not using --nogpgcheck?
Can you expand on the case here?
What should happen is:
* branching
* f30 repos gets the f31 key
* you update your f30-repos
* you jump to rawhi
On 11/03/19 15:01 +0100, Jan Pokorný wrote:
> On 11/03/19 12:31 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> Can somebody please enlighten me, how to update Rawhide after branching
>> and not using --nogpgcheck?
>
> Good question; have observed this over several (if not all since
> to-be-f26 based Rawhide) jumps
On 11/03/19 12:31 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Can somebody please enlighten me, how to update Rawhide after branching
> and not using --nogpgcheck?
Good question; have observed this over several (if not all since
to-be-f26 based Rawhide) jumps like that, and always have solved this
inconvenience b
On 3/11/19 7:31 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can somebody please enlighten me, how to update Rawhide after branching
> and not using --nogpgcheck?
>
> It seems that Rawhide keys were added in fedora-repos-30-0.4. So this is
> the package which is still "rawhide" package and has "f31" keys. Bu
Hi,
Can somebody please enlighten me, how to update Rawhide after branching
and not using --nogpgcheck?
It seems that Rawhide keys were added in fedora-repos-30-0.4. So this is
the package which is still "rawhide" package and has "f31" keys. But
this package was not probably signed, because this
20 matches
Mail list logo
