Re: Updates push status - 20150725

2015-07-31 Thread Dennis Gilmore
Note the the issue was a silent abi change in the libraries around dnf. Had we not hit the atomic issue we would have pushed out the changed abi and likely broken updates on end users systems. It is a good thing that we hit it when and how we did. Dennis On July 31, 2015 3:54:18 AM CDT, Reindl

Re: Updates push status - 20150725

2015-07-31 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 31.07.2015 um 03:15 schrieb Johnny Robeson: On Fri, 2015-07-31 at 02:40 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: Kevin Fenzi wrote: Friday (20150724), it hit a problem in the fedora22 updates-testing atomic compose. We worked thru and fixed one, but there's still some sort of issue preventing it from com

Re: Updates push status - 20150725

2015-07-30 Thread Johnny Robeson
On Fri, 2015-07-31 at 02:40 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Friday (20150724), it hit a problem in the fedora22 updates-testing > > atomic compose. We worked thru and fixed one, but there's still > > some > > sort of issue preventing it from completing. ;( > > So this useless

Re: Updates push status - 20150725

2015-07-30 Thread Kevin Kofler
Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Friday (20150724), it hit a problem in the fedora22 updates-testing > atomic compose. We worked thru and fixed one, but there's still some > sort of issue preventing it from completing. ;( So this useless "Fedora Atomic" toy now delayed updates (including security updates!) f

Re: Updates push status - 20150725

2015-07-28 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, 28 Jul 2015 13:05:30 +0300 Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > No. We continue to work on it. > > Thanks for the information, I thought I had done something wrong in > the submission process. Nope. ;) Sorry for the confusion... We _f

Re: Updates push status - 20150725

2015-07-28 Thread Alexander Ploumistos
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > No. We continue to work on it. Thanks for the information, I thought I had done something wrong in the submission process. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code

Re: Updates push status - 20150725

2015-07-28 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, 28 Jul 2015 08:57:44 +0300 Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > Has the issue been resolved? I have pushed three new packages to f22 > and f21 updates-testing, but they have yet to appear in my usual local > mirrors. No. We continue to work on it. The current issue is some more issues with th

Re: Updates push status - 20150725

2015-07-28 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 07/28/2015 07:57 AM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: Has the issue been resolved? I have pushed three new packages to f22 and f21 updates-testing, but they have yet to appear in my usual local mirrors. I guess no. I am waiting for my updates to get for weeks and am already withholding other fo

Re: Updates push status - 20150725

2015-07-27 Thread Alexander Ploumistos
Has the issue been resolved? I have pushed three new packages to f22 and f21 updates-testing, but they have yet to appear in my usual local mirrors. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproje

Updates push status - 20150725

2015-07-25 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Just a heads up before anyone asks about updates flow: I started a updates push thursday morning (20150723). It ran into some xml issues, and we cleared bodhi's cache of xml repodata and restarted things. Friday (20150724), it hit a problem in the fedora22 updates-testing atomic compose. We wo