On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 08:37:19AM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 15:09:05 +0200, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> > I think if those packages are languishing, it's like
> > the packager was already notified and chose not to push.
>
> Package goes into testing with the goal to get int
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 15:09:05 +0200, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> I think if those packages are languishing, it's like
> the packager was already notified and chose not to push.
Package goes into testing with the goal to get into stable. Therefore by
default it should go into stable when it gets appr
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 04:38:19PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hey, folks.
>
> So I've had a feeling lately that the amount of karma being filed on
> updates has dropped - especially since proventesters was axed - but I
> don't have hard numbers. I've put it on my todo list to check into this
On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 20:57 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 16:38:19 -0700,
>Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> >14 days is kind of a long time and it's easy to forget, so it's probably
> >a good idea to sign into Bodhi every so often and check if you have any
> >updates sitt
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 16:38:19 -0700,
Adam Williamson wrote:
14 days is kind of a long time and it's easy to forget, so it's probably
a good idea to sign into Bodhi every so often and check if you have any
updates sitting in updates-testing where the timeout has expired and you
can now push
Hey, folks.
So I've had a feeling lately that the amount of karma being filed on
updates has dropped - especially since proventesters was axed - but I
don't have hard numbers. I've put it on my todo list to check into this
and do what I can to fix it, though. Testers, as I always nag, please
keep
