Re: Updated spec for metainfo.xml

2015-02-05 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
On 04/02/15 12:44 AM, Richard Hughes wrote: > Usually if upstream ships a metainfo file that should be used in > preference to any downstream metainfo file, as the upstream file will > not bitrot, and usually has translations. In your case I think you can > safely remove Source1 completely. Richard

Re: Updated spec for metainfo.xml

2015-02-04 Thread Richard Hughes
On 4 February 2015 at 07:46, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > Current maintainer of gimp-elsamuko. Upstream recently added metainfo.xml > needed for Gnome Software in their package and I would like to update the > spec file to reflect the change[1]. Do I need to remove the appstream > metadata part? Us

Updated spec for metainfo.xml

2015-02-03 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
Greetings, Current maintainer of gimp-elsamuko. Upstream recently added metainfo.xml needed for Gnome Software in their package and I would like to update the spec file to reflect the change[1]. Do I need to remove the appstream metadata part? I looked at the information to no available. Thank yo