> "AP" == Alexander Ploumistos writes:
AP> However, in his last message, he left open the possibility of
AP> negotiating a different license for/with Fedora Project, but I don't
AP> feel I am the right person to engage in any further negotiations
AP> with him.
This really should get to le...
Yesterday evening George Douros uploaded updated versions of almost
every font I maintain, as well as the new "license":
http://users.teilar.gr/~g1951d/License.pdf
As you can see, there is no ambiguity, the text - despite its
shortcomings - presents a number of obstacles to the inclusion of the
fo
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 10:24 AM, Nicolas Mailhot
wrote:
> Le 2018-04-08 10:11, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek a écrit :
>>>
>>> Nothing is set in stone yet, but some
>>> time soon he is going to upload a whole new license text (hopefully in
>>> English), probably something custom-made.
>
>
> Try to
Le 2018-04-08 10:11, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek a écrit :
Nothing is set in stone yet, but some
time soon he is going to upload a whole new license text (hopefully in
English), probably something custom-made.
Try to point it to the OFL and its FAQ, it has been created exactly for
this purpos
Le 2018-04-08 14:55, Alexander Ploumistos a écrit :
My concern is if he can retroactively apply the new license to the
older versions of the fonts. Is this a valid concern or is it not how
licensing works?
Legally, he can’t. We can ship existing fonts forever, however having an
hostile upstre
On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 11:58:29PM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 8:30 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 02:55:49PM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> >> My concern is if he can retroactively apply the new license to the
> >> older
On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 8:30 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 02:55:49PM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
>> My concern is if he can retroactively apply the new license to the
>> older versions of the fonts. Is this a valid concern or is it not how
>> licensing wor
On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 02:55:49PM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> Hi Zbigniew,
>
> On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 10:11 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 07, 2018 at 10:44:41PM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> >> - If it is indeed incompatible, would trying to convince hi
Hi Zbigniew,
On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 10:11 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 07, 2018 at 10:44:41PM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
>> - If it is indeed incompatible, would trying to convince him to adopt
>> a dual license scheme be the best course of action?
> You know this
On Sat, Apr 07, 2018 at 10:44:41PM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I doubt most of you know or care about George Douros' family of fonts,
> as almost all of them are quite niche. However, there is one font in
> particular, Symbola, that a number of users and packagers care for,
Hello all,
I doubt most of you know or care about George Douros' family of fonts,
as almost all of them are quite niche. However, there is one font in
particular, Symbola, that a number of users and packagers care for,
since it follows closely all the Unicode additions and improvements.
A few of
11 matches
Mail list logo
