On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:39:57AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 06/22/2010 11:36 AM, H. Guémar wrote:
> > Just one thing, the title is misleading since Django 1.2.x is not an
> > "unsafe" version.
>
> Well, it's unsafe to drop it into a stable distribution since it's not
> completely back
On 06/22/2010 11:36 AM, H. Guémar wrote:
> Just one thing, the title is misleading since Django 1.2.x is not an
> "unsafe" version.
Well, it's unsafe to drop it into a stable distribution since it's not
completely backwards-compatible.
> So what's the plan ? The update was also pushed in previou
Just one thing, the title is misleading since Django 1.2.x is not an
"unsafe" version.
So what's the plan ? The update was also pushed in previous release like F12.
Best regards,
H.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tuesday, June 22, 2010 09:48:00 am Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 10:09 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >> No announcement was made that there was an update available for testing.
> >
> > I know it's a PITA, but it's
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 10:09 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
>> No announcement was made that there was an update available for testing.
>
> I know it's a PITA, but it's generally worth reading the updates-testing
> reports that get mailed
On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 10:09 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> No announcement was made that there was an update available for testing.
I know it's a PITA, but it's generally worth reading the updates-testing
reports that get mailed daily to the -test list so you can catch stuff
like this. I read
On 06/22/2010 09:57 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 08:03:08 -0400, Stephen wrote:
>
>> Django 1.2.1 was recently pushed to stable in Fedora 13. This should not
>> have been done without discussion on this list.
>
> Just to understand what has happened here:
> In three weeks, nobo
On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 08:03:08 -0400, Stephen wrote:
> Django 1.2.1 was recently pushed to stable in Fedora 13. This should not
> have been done without discussion on this list.
Just to understand what has happened here:
In three weeks, nobody has added any comment to the update in bodhi.
Has it g
Django 1.2.1 was recently pushed to stable in Fedora 13. This should not
have been done without discussion on this list. Django 1.2 breaks API
with Django 1.1, resulting in breaking at least two Django-based
packages in Fedora: Transifex and ReviewBoard.
ReviewBoard has an available upstream ve
