One hiding in a private directory: /usr/lib64/gnome-bluetooth/ that gnome-shell
explicitely adds to its path. It has no headers and is only usable through
introspection.
- Original Message -
> On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 05:52 -0500, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> >
On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 05:52 -0500, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> - Original Message -
>
> > Plus it wasn't just happening on its own; the state of Rawhide when
> > everyone else bogged off for Christmas was that it was suffering from
> > this, the borkage in libevdev, the gnome-bluetooth soname
- Original Message -
> Plus it wasn't just happening on its own; the state of Rawhide when
> everyone else bogged off for Christmas was that it was suffering from
> this, the borkage in libevdev, the gnome-bluetooth soname bump / library
> drop (which affects other desktops),
library drop
On 12/28/2013 02:15 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
There's another one yesterday... octave...
This one is a bit weird in that the bump was actually committed early
in december, but a build was only done yesterday.
It seems like the new octave breaks a number of the existing octave*
packages too:
(from
There's another one yesterday... octave...
This one is a bit weird in that the bump was actually committed early
in december, but a build was only done yesterday.
It seems like the new octave breaks a number of the existing octave*
packages too:
(from a scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraprojec
On Sat, 2013-12-28 at 12:21 +, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 05:50:18PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Sigh. Yes, another of these.
> >
> > On 2013-12-18, tracker was bumped to 0.7.0:
> >
> > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=485698
> >
> > the sonames o
>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=485698
>>
>> the sonames of libtracker-extract, libtracker-miner and
>> libtracker-sparql were bumped to 0.18.so.0 (from 0.16.so.0) without
>> announcement, and without all dependent packages being successfully
>> rebuilt. At least the followi
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 05:50:18PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Sigh. Yes, another of these.
>
> On 2013-12-18, tracker was bumped to 0.7.0:
>
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=485698
>
> the sonames of libtracker-extract, libtracker-miner and
> libtracker-sparql were bum
Sigh. Yes, another of these.
On 2013-12-18, tracker was bumped to 0.7.0:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=485698
the sonames of libtracker-extract, libtracker-miner and
libtracker-sparql were bumped to 0.18.so.0 (from 0.16.so.0) without
announcement, and without all dependent
