Fabio Valentini wrote:
> You are kinda right, yet you are not.
> The minimum for *autokarma* is +1 for normal updates, +2 for critpath
> updates. But the message "This update can be pushed to stable if the
> maintainer wishes" does not refer to autokarma (update getting pushed
> automatically by bo
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 3:47 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> HUmf. I also tried without much luck... (and I unpushed it as part of
> that, sorry for that).
No problem. Thank you for trying.
> Can you file a releng ticket on this and we can at the very least dig
> into the database and fix it that way.
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 11:05:04AM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 10:56 AM Mattia Verga via devel
> wrote:
> > Yeah, that's another Bodhi webUI bug (fixed in devel, but not yet
> > available in prod).
> >
> > To update the builds list of a side-tag update you can use the CLI:
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 10:56 AM Mattia Verga via devel
wrote:
> Yeah, that's another Bodhi webUI bug (fixed in devel, but not yet
> available in prod).
>
> To update the builds list of a side-tag update you can use the CLI:
> `bodhi updates edit --from-tag= `
>
> Try that...
$ bodhi updates edit
Il 18/11/20 18:43, Jerry James ha scritto:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 9:34 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>> Ah, I'm just sharing my wisdom. It has no use when I keep it to myself :)
> I need a little more wisdom. This is the update I created from the side tag:
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updat
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 9:34 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Ah, I'm just sharing my wisdom. It has no use when I keep it to myself :)
I need a little more wisdom. This is the update I created from the side tag:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-f16abf2fb5/
A tester found a probl
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 1:25 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
>
> Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > Normal updates need at *least* +2 karma so they can be pushed to
> > stable *manually*.
>
> Uh, last I checked, normal updates need only +1 (and that's a good thing,
> many updates don't even get +1 in a r
Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Normal updates need at *least* +2 karma so they can be pushed to
> stable *manually*.
Uh, last I checked, normal updates need only +1 (and that's a good thing,
many updates don't even get +1 in a reasonable time frame, let alone +2).
Only critical path packages and (IIRC
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 5:14 PM Jerry James wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 9:09 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > Normal updates need at *least* +2 karma so they can be pushed to
> > stable *manually*.
> > The default of +3 karma only makes bodhi push updates to stable
> > *earlier* automatically
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 9:09 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Normal updates need at *least* +2 karma so they can be pushed to
> stable *manually*.
> The default of +3 karma only makes bodhi push updates to stable
> *earlier* automatically, instead of after 7 days.
Gotcha. Somehow I've missed that al
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020, 16:54 Jerry James wrote:
>
> I got email today telling me that this update can be pushed stable now:
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-6960d09c20
>
> Question 1: why is that? The update needs to be in testing for 7 days
> or receive karma of 3 or more.
I got email today telling me that this update can be pushed stable now:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-6960d09c20
Question 1: why is that? The update needs to be in testing for 7 days
or receive karma of 3 or more. It has been in testing for 4 days and
has karma of 2. Why
12 matches
Mail list logo
