ion.
I wish you well in your search for a long-term solution for your needs.
Yours truly,
Leslie Satenstein
- Forwarded Message - From: مصعب الزعبي To:
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Friday, June
23, 2023 at 06:41:22 a.m. EDTSubject: Two Years of Fedora Releases
Dea
On Fri, 23 Jun 2023 10:41:00 +
مصعب الزعبي wrote:
> - One year between releases.
This is easy to attain under the current system. Just don't upgrade
every 6 months. The upgrade process is tested to upgrade 2 fedora
versions, so, for example, from f38 to f40. This is a one year
cadence. Y
> On 23 Jun 2023, at 11:41, مصعب الزعبي wrote:
>
> When upgrading the system every 6 months, alot of resources will be trashed!!
> For Fedora users and Fedora itself.
My experience supporting a commercial product on top of fedora is that it
is cheaper then using LTS distros.
The incremental
Dne 23. 06. 23 v 12:41 مصعب الزعبي napsal(a):
It will be more stable, effective, natural-friendly and feasible if we make
Fedora lifetime as:
- One year between releases.
- Two year of release lifetime.
Why do you think this cadence is more effective, natural-friendly and feasible? Do you hav
That depends on what you are looking for.
There are a lot of distributions out there, each with different goals.
Pick one which goals are closest to yours.
However if you really want Fedora without upgrading often, try to run
Fedora Rawhide - our development branch.
You will have to deal with some
On 23/06/2023 12:41, مصعب الزعبي wrote:
It will be more stable, effective, natural-friendly and feasible if we
make Fedora lifetime as:
- One year between releases.
- Two year of release lifetime.
That doesn't really work with our "First" goal [0]. Then we're just
another Ubuntu.
[0]: http
Dear Fedora development community,
As you know Fedora releases every 6 months for one year of lifetime. This is
good for development and new features implementation.
But it is not good for stability and sustainability.
When upgrading the system every 6 months, alot of resources will be trashed
