On 10/6/20 3:14 PM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 06.10.2020 22:11, Brandon Nielsen wrote:
That link shows security fixes for 68.x from only a week ago.
August 25, 2020 (68.12) vs. September 22, 2020 (78.3).
But still, the last 68. release was 5 days ago[0], hardly seems unsupported.
On 06.10.2020 22:11, Brandon Nielsen wrote:
That link shows security fixes for 68.x from only a week ago.
August 25, 2020 (68.12) vs. September 22, 2020 (78.3).
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@li
On 10/6/20 3:11 PM, Brandon Nielsen wrote:
On 10/6/20 3:03 PM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 06.10.2020 21:48, Brandon Nielsen wrote:
Yes, but they clearly don't expect updates to work given the changes
mentioned later in this thread and the release notes, and Fedora has
users that will b
On 10/6/20 3:03 PM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 06.10.2020 21:48, Brandon Nielsen wrote:
Yes, but they clearly don't expect updates to work given the changes
mentioned later in this thread and the release notes, and Fedora has
users that will be updating that need to be considered.
78.
On 06.10.2020 21:48, Brandon Nielsen wrote:
Yes, but they clearly don't expect updates to work given the changes
mentioned later in this thread and the release notes, and Fedora has
users that will be updating that need to be considered.
78.3.1 includes security fixes[1]. 68.x has reached its
On 06.10.2020 21:38, Gordon Messmer wrote:
Thunderbird > 68 has significant API changes. XUL has been completely
removed for extensions, as well as numerous other breaking API changes,
including to preferences and address books.
Version 68.x is now EOL. It will no longer receive even security
On 10/6/20 2:45 PM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 06.10.2020 21:24, Brandon Nielsen wrote:
Sounds to me they don't expect 78.2.1 to be entirely compatible with
profiles from the previous version.
$ rpm -qa thunderbird
thunderbird-78.3.1-1.fc32.x86_64
Version 78.3.1 is production ready. M
On 10/6/20 12:08 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
I'll put in a BZ as soon as I'm not tied up in meetings.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1885722
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le.
On 06.10.2020 21:24, Brandon Nielsen wrote:
Sounds to me they don't expect 78.2.1 to be entirely compatible with
profiles from the previous version.
$ rpm -qa thunderbird
thunderbird-78.3.1-1.fc32.x86_64
Version 78.3.1 is production ready. Mozilla has made it available to all
Thunderbird user
On 10/6/20 12:22 PM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 06.10.2020 21:08, Gordon Messmer wrote:
I definitely think this should be rolled back. We're past the beta
freeze, and IMO, this violates the updates policy which states
"Package maintainers MUST: Avoid Major version updates, ABI
break
On 10/6/20 2:22 PM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 06.10.2020 21:08, Gordon Messmer wrote:
I definitely think this should be rolled back. We're past the beta
freeze, and IMO, this violates the updates policy which states
"Package maintainers MUST: Avoid Major version updates, ABI
breaka
On 06.10.2020 21:08, Gordon Messmer wrote:
I definitely think this should be rolled back. We're past the beta
freeze, and IMO, this violates the updates policy which states "Package
maintainers MUST: Avoid Major version updates, ABI breakage, or API
changes if at all possible."
Thunderbird
On 10/6/20 4:29 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
Thunderbird 78 seems to be a major "breaking" upgrade:
https://www.thunderbird.net/en-US/thunderbird/78.2.1/releasenotes/#changes
I definitely think this should be rolled back. We're past the beta
freeze, and IMO, this violates the updates policy which
13 matches
Mail list logo
