On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 10:21:50AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 12:32:45PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > So I think the whole issue can be solved by letting tools use
> > two keys for rawhide. The patch for mkosi was merged [1].
> > Should we do something simi
On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 12:32:45PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>
> Oh, OK. So it was a misunderstanding on my side. I thought that since e.g. F41
> has a bunch of packages taken from F40 and F39 and earlier, they will be
> signed
> by those respective keys. But we resign them, so th
On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 12:32:45PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 09:37:25AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 11:12:07AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > In my earlier message I quoted this case:
> > >
> > > > [1] From
> > >
Dne 16. 02. 24 v 18:27 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 09:46:05AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Other solution could be if Rawhide lived in rawhide repos instead of f41.
I'm not sure I follow... rawhide is in a rawhide repo?
pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/
I stand cor
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 09:37:25AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 11:12:07AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > In my earlier message I quoted this case:
> >
> > > [1] From
> > > https://github.com/systemd/systemd/actions/runs/7919159325/job/21619276641?pr=31338:
>
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 09:37:25AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
...snip...
>
> It should have been. I am not sure where the process failed.
>
> I did generate the fedora-42 key.
FYI, I was lacking coffee or something.
it's there in the rawhide fedora-repos:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fe
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 11:12:07AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 06:03:59PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > That won't do it. We need mock to update it's config at exactly the same
> > moment a successfull rawhide compose completes and mirrors to whatever
> > mir
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 09:46:05AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Other solution could be if Rawhide lived in rawhide repos instead of f41.
I'm not sure I follow... rawhide is in a rawhide repo?
pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/
Or did you mean to sign rawhide with a 'rawhide' key alw
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 11:12:07AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 06:03:59PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > That won't do it. We need mock to update it's config at exactly the same
> > moment a successfull rawhide compose completes and mirrors to whatever
> > mir
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 06:03:59PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> That won't do it. We need mock to update it's config at exactly the same
> moment a successfull rawhide compose completes and mirrors to whatever
> mirror you are hitting. ;(
>
> We make keys a year ahead now. The f42 key is in fedora
Dne 16. 02. 24 v 3:03 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 07:57:37PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
It's this time of the year again:
...
Could we please do something so that this doesn't happen?
Dunno, generate and distribute the keys earlier so that mock
and https://fe
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 07:57:37PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> It's this time of the year again:
...
>
> Could we please do something so that this doesn't happen?
> Dunno, generate and distribute the keys earlier so that mock
> and https://fedoraproject.org/fedora.gpg get updated _
It's this time of the year again:
Running transaction
Importing PGP key 0xA15B79CC:
Userid : "Fedora (40) "
Fingerprint: 115DF9AEF857853EE8445D0A0727707EA15B79CC
From :
file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-40-primary
The key was successfully imported.
Imp
13 matches
Mail list logo
