Re: Temporary package rollback by using Version: +really.

2020-02-24 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 03:26:57PM +0100, Sandro Mani wrote: > > On 24.02.20 14:30, Sandro Mani wrote: > > > > On 24.02.20 14:21, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > But removing the dependency just restores it to the level of accuracy > > > it had before the introduction of that dependency. > > That's a goo

Re: Temporary package rollback by using Version: +really.

2020-02-24 Thread Sandro Mani
On 24.02.20 14:30, Sandro Mani wrote: On 24.02.20 14:21, Neal Gompa wrote: But removing the dependency just restores it to the level of accuracy it had before the introduction of that dependency. That's a good point, I've asked upstream if that is actually the case or whether the dependency r

Re: Temporary package rollback by using Version: +really.

2020-02-24 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 24.02.2020 14:30, Sandro Mani wrote: > That's a good point, I've asked upstream if that is actually the case or > whether the dependency replaced previous logic which would also need to > be restored to get the same level of accuracy. You can just revert some upstream commits by downstream patc

Re: Temporary package rollback by using Version: +really.

2020-02-24 Thread Sandro Mani
On 24.02.20 14:21, Neal Gompa wrote: But removing the dependency just restores it to the level of accuracy it had before the introduction of that dependency. That's a good point, I've asked upstream if that is actually the case or whether the dependency replaced previous logic which would also

Re: Temporary package rollback by using Version: +really.

2020-02-24 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 8:21 AM Sandro Mani wrote: > > > On 24.02.20 14:14, Neal Gompa wrote: > > You can do that trick, it'll even kind of work. But we don't typically > > do this. That said, why not just patch it to remove the non-free > > dependency, even if it weakens the functionality a bit?

Re: Temporary package rollback by using Version: +really.

2020-02-24 Thread Sandro Mani
On 24.02.20 14:14, Neal Gompa wrote: You can do that trick, it'll even kind of work. But we don't typically do this. That said, why not just patch it to remove the non-free dependency, even if it weakens the functionality a bit? I suppose licensecheck is mostly used for package reviews, so it mi

Re: Temporary package rollback by using Version: +really.

2020-02-24 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 8:11 AM Sandro Mani wrote: > > Hi > > Get ship a working licensecheck again in rawhide (stuck at v3.0.39 due to > later versions requiring a non-free library), I need to temporarily downgrade > perl-Regexp-Pattern-License, which was since updated to a version which isn't

Temporary package rollback by using Version: +really.

2020-02-24 Thread Sandro Mani
Hi Get ship a working licensecheck again in rawhide (stuck at v3.0.39 due to later versions requiring a non-free library), I need to temporarily downgrade perl-Regexp-Pattern-License, which was since updated to a version which isn't compatible with licensecheck-3.0.39 anymore. This is a tempo