On Thu, Dec 5, 2024 at 12:34 PM Jaroslav Škarvada wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2024 at 12:05 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > On 05. 12. 24 11:57, Jaroslav Škarvada wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 10:30 PM Jaroslav Škarvada
> > > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 6:14 PM Miro Hrončok
On Thu, Dec 5, 2024 at 12:05 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 05. 12. 24 11:57, Jaroslav Škarvada wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 10:30 PM Jaroslav Škarvada
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 6:14 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 04. 11. 24 17:26, Jaroslav Škarvada wrote:
> I
On 05. 12. 24 11:57, Jaroslav Škarvada wrote:
On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 10:30 PM Jaroslav Škarvada wrote:
On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 6:14 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 04. 11. 24 17:26, Jaroslav Škarvada wrote:
I am going to add compat Tcl/Tk 8.6 packages, because IMHO porting of
the packages to Tcl/
On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 10:30 PM Jaroslav Škarvada wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 6:14 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > On 04. 11. 24 17:26, Jaroslav Škarvada wrote:
> > > I am going to add compat Tcl/Tk 8.6 packages, because IMHO porting of
> > > the packages to Tcl/Tk 9 will take significant ti
On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 6:14 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 04. 11. 24 17:26, Jaroslav Škarvada wrote:
> > I am going to add compat Tcl/Tk 8.6 packages, because IMHO porting of
> > the packages to Tcl/Tk 9 will take significant time and maybe some of
> > the packages will never be ported. But IMHO i
Added: https://release-monitoring.org/project/4941/
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-
On Monday, November 4, 2024 5:43:35 AM Eastern Standard Time Florian Weimer
wrote:
> The -ansi option requests C89 mode, and C89 does not have an inline
> keyword. In C89, “static inline;” would have been a variable of type
> int called “inline”, so the compiler's suggestion is technically
> corr
On 04. 11. 24 17:26, Jaroslav Škarvada wrote:
I am going to add compat Tcl/Tk 8.6 packages, because IMHO porting of
the packages to Tcl/Tk 9 will take significant time and maybe some of
the packages will never be ported. But IMHO it will also require
changes in the affected packages, at least cha
I am going to add compat Tcl/Tk 8.6 packages, because IMHO porting of
the packages to Tcl/Tk 9 will take significant time and maybe some of
the packages will never be ported. But IMHO it will also require
changes in the affected packages, at least changing the BuildRequires
to the compat Tcl/Tk ver
* Garry T. Williams:
> On Saturday, 2 November 2024 23:24:50 EDT Garry T. Williams wrote:
>> I am trying to port deal to tcl 9.0.0 and I am stuck.
>>
>> My package required many changes mostly changing certain int variables
>> to type Tcl_Size (aka long). I got down to only one error compiling
>
On Saturday, 2 November 2024 23:24:50 EDT Garry T. Williams wrote:
> I am trying to port deal to tcl 9.0.0 and I am stuck.
>
> My package required many changes mostly changing certain int variables
> to type Tcl_Size (aka long). I got down to only one error compiling
> any file that includes tcl.
On Monday, 14 October 2024 12:55:39 EDT Jaroslav Škarvada wrote:
> I would like to rebase Tcl/Tk in rawhide (f42) to the latest stable
> 9.0.0 release. Unfortunately, there are several incompatibilities [1]
> and several applications will require porting.
[snip]
> deal
I am trying to port deal t
On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 03:36:44PM -0400, Garry T. Williams wrote:
> On Monday, 14 October 2024 15:39:05 EDT Jaroslav Škarvada wrote:
> > NP, I will setup Copr
>
> I am trying to test changes to deal, but I don't know how to tell my
> local mock command to get tcl-devel from your copr. Can you he
On Monday, 14 October 2024 15:39:05 EDT Jaroslav Škarvada wrote:
> NP, I will setup Copr
I am trying to test changes to deal, but I don't know how to tell my
local mock command to get tcl-devel from your copr. Can you help?
--
Garry T. Williams
--
___
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 12:46:08PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I had a go at 'expect'. Mostly it fails because of the _ANSI_ARGS_
> and TCL_VARARGS macros going away, which are easy, albeit very tedious,
> to fix.
>
> Do you have a source git repo of what we use in Fedora already
> (ie. in
I had a go at 'expect'. Mostly it fails because of the _ANSI_ARGS_
and TCL_VARARGS macros going away, which are easy, albeit very tedious,
to fix.
Do you have a source git repo of what we use in Fedora already
(ie. including the patches)?
I notice upstream hasn't had a release since 2018 and is
On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 5:23 PM Keith Seitz wrote:
>
> On 10/14/24 9:55 AM, Jaroslav Škarvada wrote:
> > List of packages that tailed to compile with Tcl/Tk 9.0.0 follows:
> >
> > blt
> > brltty
> > cgnslib
> > classified-ads
> > deal
> > eggdrop
> > emacspeak
> > expect
>
> A lot of GNU packages
On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 5:20 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 14. 10. 24 18:55, Jaroslav Škarvada wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to rebase Tcl/Tk in rawhide (f42) to the latest stable
> > 9.0.0 release. Unfortunately, there are several incompatibilities [1]
> > and several applications will requ
On 10/14/24 9:55 AM, Jaroslav Škarvada wrote:
List of packages that tailed to compile with Tcl/Tk 9.0.0 follows:
blt
brltty
cgnslib
classified-ads
deal
eggdrop
emacspeak
expect
A lot of GNU packages require DejaGNU (not listed), which requires
expect. These include (minimally) binutils, gcc, a
On 14. 10. 24 18:55, Jaroslav Škarvada wrote:
Hi,
I would like to rebase Tcl/Tk in rawhide (f42) to the latest stable
9.0.0 release. Unfortunately, there are several incompatibilities [1]
and several applications will require porting. I will create side-tag
and bugs for individual packages...
On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 10:21:09AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > ocaml-labltk
>
> I filed a bug upstream:
>
> https://github.com/garrigue/labltk/issues/27
This one's a bit of a mess, to say the least. I added a comment on
the issue above, but I'll wait for upstream to fix it.
Rich.
-
On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 10:21:09AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 08:12:43PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 06:55:39PM +0200, Jaroslav Škarvada wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I would like to rebase Tcl/Tk in rawhide (f42) to the latest stable
On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 08:12:43PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 06:55:39PM +0200, Jaroslav Škarvada wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to rebase Tcl/Tk in rawhide (f42) to the latest stable
> > 9.0.0 release. Unfortunately, there are several incompatibilities [1]
> >
On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 9:39 PM Jaroslav Škarvada wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 8:14 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > On 14. 10. 24 18:55, Jaroslav Škarvada wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I would like to rebase Tcl/Tk in rawhide (f42) to the latest stable
> > > 9.0.0 release. Unfortunately, ther
Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2024/10/15 15:30:
Jaroslav Škarvada wrote on 2024/10/15 1:55:
Hi,
I would like to rebase Tcl/Tk in rawhide (f42) to the latest stable
9.0.0 release. Unfortunately, there are several incompatibilities [1]
and several applications will require porting. I will create side-ta
Jaroslav Škarvada wrote on 2024/10/15 1:55:
Hi,
I would like to rebase Tcl/Tk in rawhide (f42) to the latest stable
9.0.0 release. Unfortunately, there are several incompatibilities [1]
and several applications will require porting. I will create side-tag
and bugs for individual packages. For th
On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 8:14 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 14. 10. 24 18:55, Jaroslav Škarvada wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to rebase Tcl/Tk in rawhide (f42) to the latest stable
> > 9.0.0 release. Unfortunately, there are several incompatibilities [1]
> > and several applications will requ
On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 06:55:39PM +0200, Jaroslav Škarvada wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to rebase Tcl/Tk in rawhide (f42) to the latest stable
> 9.0.0 release. Unfortunately, there are several incompatibilities [1]
> and several applications will require porting. I will create side-tag
> and bug
On 14. 10. 24 20:14, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 14. 10. 24 18:55, Jaroslav Škarvada wrote:
Hi,
I would like to rebase Tcl/Tk in rawhide (f42) to the latest stable
9.0.0 release. Unfortunately, there are several incompatibilities [1]
and several applications will require porting. I will create side-
On 14. 10. 24 18:55, Jaroslav Škarvada wrote:
Hi,
I would like to rebase Tcl/Tk in rawhide (f42) to the latest stable
9.0.0 release. Unfortunately, there are several incompatibilities [1]
and several applications will require porting. I will create side-tag
and bugs for individual packages. For
Hi,
I would like to rebase Tcl/Tk in rawhide (f42) to the latest stable
9.0.0 release. Unfortunately, there are several incompatibilities [1]
and several applications will require porting. I will create side-tag
and bugs for individual packages. For the preliminary testing there
are Tcl/Tk SRPMs a
31 matches
Mail list logo
