I agree with Kevin on this one.
Since Josef Radinger (fas: Cheese) is already a sponsored maintainer
and the package legibly and properly accepted into packages
collection,
it should fall under the non responsive maintainer policy. We're
already short on reviewers not to waste time over petty issu
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> you can not review your own packages. so it will need to be re-reviewed
He didn't review his own package, he reviewed a package somebody else
submitted and it passed his review. I don't see why he can't now pick it up
given that the "somebody else" who submitted it vanis
On Wednesday, June 09, 2010 05:39:22 am Pierre-Yves wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On the 12th of May I approved the package R-caTools [1].
> Since, and despite 2 ping on the bugzilla, there has been no sign of
> life from the original submitter.
>
> The question is then, can I do the cvs request for this
On 06/09/2010 06:46 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
> On 09/06/10 11:39, Pierre-Yves wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> On the 12th of May I approved the package R-caTools [1].
>> Since, and despite 2 ping on the bugzilla, there has been no sign of
>> life from the original submitter.
>>
>> The question is then
On 09/06/10 11:39, Pierre-Yves wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On the 12th of May I approved the package R-caTools [1].
> Since, and despite 2 ping on the bugzilla, there has been no sign of
> life from the original submitter.
>
> The question is then, can I do the cvs request for this package and take
> over
Hi all,
On the 12th of May I approved the package R-caTools [1].
Since, and despite 2 ping on the bugzilla, there has been no sign of
life from the original submitter.
The question is then, can I do the cvs request for this package and take
over its maintenance in place of the original submitter
