Steering Committee.
== Summary ==
Improve security by enabling some of the high level systemd security
hardening settings that isolate and sandbox default system services.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:Sundaram| Rahul Sundaram]]
* Email: methe...@gmail.com
== Detailed Description ==
systemd provides a
- Original Message -
> From: "Tomasz Torcz"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Thursday, October 6, 2016 3:11:36 PM
> Subject: Re: Systemd Security
>
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 04:05:34PM -0400, Ivan Chavero wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 06, 2
- Original Message -
> From: "Lennart Poettering"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Thursday, October 6, 2016 11:58:06 AM
> Subject: Re: Systemd Security
>
> On Thu, 06.10.16 12:33, Ivan Chavero (ichav...@redhat.com)
Once upon a time, Ivan Chavero said:
> I'm not hijacking any thread, I STARTED this thread
No, you didn't start a thread. You posted a reply to an unrelated
message (the subject of that message was "Re: Fedora 25 Beta 1.1 compose
check report").
When you want to start a new thread, do not reply
On Thu, 2016-10-06 at 16:05 -0400, Ivan Chavero wrote:
> I'm not hijacking any thread, I STARTED this thread (BTW, just searched for
> emails
> with the "Systemd Security" subject in this mailing list and didn't find any
> immediate matches) because i have an hon
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 04:05:34PM -0400, Ivan Chavero wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 12:33:30PM -0400, Ivan Chavero wrote:
> > >
> > > I found this article stating some alarming claims about systemd
> > > security, are this claims true?
> > >
>
- Original Message -
> From: "Tomasz Torcz"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Thursday, October 6, 2016 11:53:23 AM
> Subject: Re: Systemd Security
>
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 12:33:30PM -0400, Ivan Chavero wrote:
> >
> > I found t
On Thu, 06.10.16 12:33, Ivan Chavero (ichav...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Setting a umask of 0 means that, by default, any file created by systemd
> will be world-readable and -writable. Systemd defines a macro called
> RUN_WITH_UMASK
> which is used to temporarily set a more restrictive umask when s
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 12:33:30PM -0400, Ivan Chavero wrote:
>
> I found this article stating some alarming claims about systemd
> security, are this claims true?
>
First of all, do not hijack threads. If you want to start something new,
start it, and do not reply to unre
I found this article stating some alarming claims about systemd
security, are this claims true?
If so, as developers should we be hardening systemd?
It states stuff like this:
"
Systemd's "we don't make mistakes" attitude towards security can be seen in
other place
10 matches
Mail list logo
