On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 01:34:18AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > * #1592 - Redefinition of what constitutes a secondary/alternate
> > ~ architecture in Fedora (sgallagh, 16:04:18)
> > ~ * AGREED: FESCo approves the new alternative architectures plan (+7,
> > ~0, -
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 09:14:14PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 08/14/2016 08:52 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 11:29:13AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >>On the hardware side of things there's numerous ways go getting access
> >>to hardware, we now have a pair of ve
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> No, it helps everyone. Many bugs on these other arches turn out to
> expose bugs on x86 too.
All the ones I ran into were bugs or obscure limitations in the toolchain
that were entirely target-specific. They weren't even bugs in the package
that failed to build, let alone on
On Sun, 14 Aug 2016 12:57:52 -0600
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I'm planning (probibly next week, if I can kick this flu) to setup a
> ppc64le test machine, just like the other test machines... Hopefully
> that will help out.
>
> We can do the same for aarch64 in a few weeks when we have them
> availab
On Sun, 14 Aug 2016 01:34:18 +0200
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Sigh! So the proposal to break Fedora got unanimously approved
> without restrictions. I wonder why you requested a mailing list
> thread to be opened at all, given that you simply completely ignored
> the mailing list feedback. The "feedba
On 08/14/2016 08:52 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 11:29:13AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
On the hardware side of things there's numerous ways go getting access
to hardware, we now have a pair of very large Power8 boxes in the
Fedora cloud instance,
Peter, is it possibl
On Sun, 14 Aug 2016 19:52:21 +0100
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 11:29:13AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > On the hardware side of things there's numerous ways go getting
> > access to hardware, we now have a pair of very large Power8 boxes
> > in the Fedora cloud instan
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 11:29:13AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On the hardware side of things there's numerous ways go getting access
> to hardware, we now have a pair of very large Power8 boxes in the
> Fedora cloud instance,
Peter, is it possible to set up long-term access to a POWER virtual
Peter Robinson wrote:
> On the hardware side of things there's numerous ways go getting access
> to hardware, we now have a pair of very large Power8 boxes in the
> Fedora cloud instance, there's a number of universities that provide
> access to IBM Power and Z-series devices and Linaro has a means
Peter Robinson wrote:
> There was feedback that was taken into account as part of the proposal
> that came from the mailing list,
Only in the form of more writeup in the Q&A section giving various excuses
for not addressing any of the fatal flaws that were pointed out in the
thread (such as the
>> See that's where we disagree, there are 1000s of users that use those,
>> you could also argue that the vast majority of Fedora instances aren't
>> desktop platforms but servers/VMs and other non desktop usecases (I
>> know of one company running Fedora on over a million ARM devices) yet
>> we s
On 14/08/16 08:49, Peter Robinson wrote:
See that's where we disagree, there are 1000s of users that use those,
you could also argue that the vast majority of Fedora instances aren't
desktop platforms but servers/VMs and other non desktop usecases (I
know of one company running Fedora on over a
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 12:34 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> * #1592 - Redefinition of what constitutes a secondary/alternate
>> ~ architecture in Fedora (sgallagh, 16:04:18)
>> ~ * AGREED: FESCo approves the new alternative architectures plan (+7,
>> ~0, -0) (sgalla
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> * #1592 - Redefinition of what constitutes a secondary/alternate
> ~ architecture in Fedora (sgallagh, 16:04:18)
> ~ * AGREED: FESCo approves the new alternative architectures plan (+7,
> ~0, -0) (sgallagh, 16:11:29)
Sigh! So the proposal to break Fedora got unan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2016-08-12)
===
Meeting started by sgallagh at 16:01:05 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2016-08-12/fesco
15 matches
Mail list logo
