Re: Suggests/Recommends proposal [Was: Re: PackageKit in Fedora 15 (beta)]

2011-04-27 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:47, Kevin Kofler wrote: > tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote: >> The hard part is to define what the package tools should do in the >> different cases >> A depsolver need to work with real requirements, so it need to be defined >> in what cases that a soft requirement will be

Re: Suggests/Recommends proposal [Was: Re: PackageKit in Fedora 15 (beta)]

2011-04-27 Thread Kevin Kofler
tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote: > The hard part is to define what the package tools should do in the > different cases > A depsolver need to work with real requirements, so it need to be defined > in what cases that a soft requirement will become a real requirements to > do the right thing See my p

Re: Suggests/Recommends proposal [Was: Re: PackageKit in Fedora 15 (beta)]

2011-04-27 Thread tim.laurid...@gmail.com
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Matej Cepl wrote: > Dne 26.4.2011 18:23, Florian Festi napsal(a): > > I think if anybody can come up with a exact description how they should > > look like and how they should work and can create some evidence that > > this is want we need and want implementing th

Suggests/Recommends proposal [Was: Re: PackageKit in Fedora 15 (beta)]

2011-04-26 Thread Matej Cepl
Dne 26.4.2011 18:23, Florian Festi napsal(a): > I think if anybody can come up with a exact description how they should > look like and how they should work and can create some evidence that > this is want we need and want implementing them is not the problem[*]. > Until now no one has come up with