On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 11:35:55AM -0500, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 03/21/2017 07:33 AM, Jerry James wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:05 PM, Jerry James wrote:
> > > I'm really not sure what to check next. If an aarch64 box for
> > > packagers will be available in the not too distant
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 01:10:22PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> So, if someone could try on a fedora 25 host to setup a rawhide/f26 mock
> chroot and try and build maxima in it, and see if it hangs installing
> the buildsys packages (in particular the 'time' package) that would be
> great.
I tried
Rex Dieter wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
>> On 03/21/2017 10:35 AM, Jeremy Linton wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 03/21/2017 07:33 AM, Jerry James wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:05 PM, Jerry James
wrote:
> I'm really not sure what to check next. If an aarch64 box for
> packagers
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 03/21/2017 10:35 AM, Jeremy Linton wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 03/21/2017 07:33 AM, Jerry James wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:05 PM, Jerry James
>>> wrote:
I'm really not sure what to check next. If an aarch64 box for
packagers will be available in the not to
On 03/21/2017 10:35 AM, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 03/21/2017 07:33 AM, Jerry James wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:05 PM, Jerry James
>> wrote:
>>> I'm really not sure what to check next. If an aarch64 box for
>>> packagers will be available in the not too distant future, I will try
Hi,
On 03/21/2017 07:33 AM, Jerry James wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:05 PM, Jerry James wrote:
I'm really not sure what to check next. If an aarch64 box for
packagers will be available in the not too distant future, I will try
to debug this. Thanks for the information, Kevin.
This issu
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:05 PM, Jerry James wrote:
> I'm really not sure what to check next. If an aarch64 box for
> packagers will be available in the not too distant future, I will try
> to debug this. Thanks for the information, Kevin.
This issue is now blocking a large update of sagemath a
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> So, something about the aarch64 'time' package? Nothing really leaps to
> out at a quick glance, and wouldn't other packages hit this? and whats
> pulling in the time package anyhow?
The maxima package BuildRequires: time, for what purpose I
On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 21:02:40 -0700
Jerry James wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 3:15 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Hey. I looked at this a few weeks ago... but I don't recall all the
> > details so I wanted to look more closely at it again before I
> > replied.
> >
> > However, I have not had time
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 3:15 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Hey. I looked at this a few weeks ago... but I don't recall all the
> details so I wanted to look more closely at it again before I replied.
>
> However, I have not had time since your orig email on saturday to do
> so.
>
> I'll try and look so
On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 14:28:14 -0700
Jerry James wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 1:12 PM, Jerry James
> wrote:
> > I fixed the mass rebuild FTBFS errors for clisp and ecl yesterday,
> > and started a build of maxima due to changes in both clisp and ecl.
> > Something is afoot.
>
> Is there any
On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 1:12 PM, Jerry James wrote:
> I fixed the mass rebuild FTBFS errors for clisp and ecl yesterday, and
> started a build of maxima due to changes in both clisp and ecl.
> Something is afoot.
Is there anybody here who can take a look at this? The dnf
transaction is apparentl
I fixed the mass rebuild FTBFS errors for clisp and ecl yesterday, and
started a build of maxima due to changes in both clisp and ecl.
Something is afoot.
There are two previous builds for maxima that both claim to be in the
building state, but were started quite a long time ago:
19 Dec 2016: htt
13 matches
Mail list logo
