On Mon, 2 Jan 2017 13:59:25 + (UTC)
Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2016-12-24, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Fri, 23 Dec 2016 10:30:12 + (UTC)
> > Petr Pisar wrote:
> >> No. This is a generic problem that the ExclusiveArch hack as
> >> documents in packaging guidelines (i.e. noarch package with
>
On 12/24/2016 06:03 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> Packager can override channel manually when needed. When submitting
>> build, you can choose which channel to use. For example, when you want
>> the build to be ran on x86_64 you can select "livecd" channel [2],
>> which contains only x86_64 hosts. In t
On 2016-12-24, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Dec 2016 10:30:12 + (UTC)
> Petr Pisar wrote:
>> No. This is a generic problem that the ExclusiveArch hack as
>> documents in packaging guidelines (i.e. noarch package with
>> ExclusiveArch including noarch) is not honored by infrastructure.
>
>
>> >>> The failure yesterday that I was thinking of was:
>> >>> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17004112
>> >>>
>> >>> Re-submitting it 4 minutes later passed just fine:
>> >>> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17004125
>> >> These builds were ran on different
On Thu, 22 Dec 2016 10:15:57 +0100
Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> On 12/22/2016 09:50 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >
> >
> > Dne 22.12.2016 v 09:27 Mikolaj Izdebski napsal(a):
> >> On 12/22/2016 05:06 AM, Christopher wrote:
> >>> The failure yesterday that I was thinking of was:
> >>> https://koji.f
On Fri, 23 Dec 2016 10:30:12 + (UTC)
Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2016-12-23, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > On Friday, December 23, 2016 10:42:33 AM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> >> On Friday, December 23, 2016 9:33:31 AM CET Petr Pisar wrote:
> >> > >> Wouldn't be possible to build noarch packages ju
On 2016-12-23, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Friday, December 23, 2016 10:42:33 AM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
>> On Friday, December 23, 2016 9:33:31 AM CET Petr Pisar wrote:
>> > >> Wouldn't be possible to build noarch packages just on primary
>> > >> arch builders for example?
>> > >
>> > > Those arch
On 12/23/2016 10:42 AM, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Friday, December 23, 2016 9:33:31 AM CET Petr Pisar wrote:
Wouldn't be possible to build noarch packages just on primary arch builders
for example?
>>>
>>> Those arches are all primary .. but ExclusiveArch could help.
>>>
>> No, it does no
On Friday, December 23, 2016 10:42:33 AM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Friday, December 23, 2016 9:33:31 AM CET Petr Pisar wrote:
> > >> Wouldn't be possible to build noarch packages just on primary arch
> > >> builders
> > >> for example?
> > >
> > > Those arches are all primary .. but ExclusiveA
On Friday, December 23, 2016 9:33:31 AM CET Petr Pisar wrote:
> >> Wouldn't be possible to build noarch packages just on primary arch builders
> >> for example?
> >
> > Those arches are all primary .. but ExclusiveArch could help.
> >
> No, it does not. I have noarch perl-Alien-ROOT with ExclusiveA
On 2016-12-22, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Thursday, December 22, 2016 9:50:12 AM CET Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>
>> Dne 22.12.2016 v 09:27 Mikolaj Izdebski napsal(a):
>> > On 12/22/2016 05:06 AM, Christopher wrote:
>> >> The failure yesterday that I was thinking of was:
>> >> https://koji.fedoraproject.
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 5:16 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 22.12.2016 v 10:12 Pavel Raiskup napsal(a):
>> On Thursday, December 22, 2016 9:50:12 AM CET Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>
>>> Wouldn't be possible to build noarch packages just on primary arch builders
>>> for example?
>> Those arches are all
On 12/22/2016 10:59 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
In my specific case, rubygem-mongo is MongoDB client and it needs
MondoDB server (which does not support BE architectures) to execute its
test suite. But otherwise it can run on all platforms and connect to
remote server just fine.
Hasn't this mongodb
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 22.12.2016 v 10:12 Pavel Raiskup napsal(a):
>> On Thursday, December 22, 2016 9:50:12 AM CET Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>
>>> Wouldn't be possible to build noarch packages just on primary arch builders
>>> for example?
>> Those arches are all
Dne 22.12.2016 v 10:12 Pavel Raiskup napsal(a):
> On Thursday, December 22, 2016 9:50:12 AM CET Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>> Wouldn't be possible to build noarch packages just on primary arch builders
>> for example?
> Those arches are all primary .. but ExclusiveArch could help.
No, not all arches b
Dne 22.12.2016 v 10:23 Tom Hughes napsal(a):
> On 22/12/16 09:19, Michal Schorm wrote:
>>> Honestly this is annoying misbehavior. How we can tell Koji to avoid
>>> certain builders for certain noarch packages? Wouldn't be possible to
>>> build noarch packages just on primary arch builders for exa
Hi Vít Ondruch:
> Honestly this is annoying misbehavior. How we can tell Koji to avoid
> certain builders for certain noarch packages? Wouldn't be possible to
> build noarch packages just on primary arch builders for example?
Will ExclusiveArch: %{nodejs_arches} noarch help?
https://fedoraproject.
On 22/12/16 09:19, Michal Schorm wrote:
Honestly this is annoying misbehavior. How we can tell Koji to avoid
certain builders for certain noarch packages? Wouldn't be possible to
build noarch packages just on primary arch builders for example?
You can. (make it arch specific)
It doesn't make an
> Honestly this is annoying misbehavior. How we can tell Koji to avoid
> certain builders for certain noarch packages? Wouldn't be possible to
> build noarch packages just on primary arch builders for example?
You can. (make it arch specific)
It doesn't make any sense to me - you want noarch packa
On 12/22/2016 09:50 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 22.12.2016 v 09:27 Mikolaj Izdebski napsal(a):
>> On 12/22/2016 05:06 AM, Christopher wrote:
>>> The failure yesterday that I was thinking of was:
>>> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17004112
>>>
>>> Re-submitting it 4 minut
On Thursday, December 22, 2016 9:50:12 AM CET Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 22.12.2016 v 09:27 Mikolaj Izdebski napsal(a):
> > On 12/22/2016 05:06 AM, Christopher wrote:
> >> The failure yesterday that I was thinking of was:
> >> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17004112
> >>
> >>
I understand this was not the cause to FTBFS, but FTR:
On Thursday, December 22, 2016 3:03:56 AM CET Christopher wrote:
> sh: /usr/bin/python: No such file or directory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1243292
> warning: Could not canonicalize hostname: buildvm-14.phx2.fedoraproject.org
https://gith
Dne 22.12.2016 v 09:27 Mikolaj Izdebski napsal(a):
> On 12/22/2016 05:06 AM, Christopher wrote:
>> The failure yesterday that I was thinking of was:
>> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17004112
>>
>> Re-submitting it 4 minutes later passed just fine:
>> https://koji.fedoraproje
On 12/22/2016 05:06 AM, Christopher wrote:
> The failure yesterday that I was thinking of was:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17004112
>
> Re-submitting it 4 minutes later passed just fine:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17004125
These builds were ran
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 10:14 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Dec 2016 03:03:56 +
> Christopher wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I occasionally get this strange failure in koji. Sometimes this
> > happens with a good package build, and I can just re-submit it
> > without changing anything, and it
On Thu, 22 Dec 2016 03:03:56 +
Christopher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I occasionally get this strange failure in koji. Sometimes this
> happens with a good package build, and I can just re-submit it
> without changing anything, and it works fine. Is this a known issue?
>
> For example, from
> https:/
Hi,
I occasionally get this strange failure in koji. Sometimes this happens
with a good package build, and I can just re-submit it without changing
anything, and it works fine. Is this a known issue?
For example, from
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/1330/17021330/build.log:
sh: /u
Hi,
I occasionally get this strange failure in koji. Sometimes this happens
with a good package build, and I can just re-submit it without changing
anything, and it works fine. Is this a known issue?
For example, from
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/1330/17021330/build.log:
sh: /u
28 matches
Mail list logo
