Re: Status of btrfs in rawhide

2011-05-10 Thread Josef Bacik
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Matej Cepl wrote: > Dne 10.5.2011 23:49, Josef Bacik napsal(a): >> btrfs-progs hasn't changed much so you should be fine with whats in >> fedora.  If you want to be testing the latest and greatest it's >> probably better to either follow Chris's btrfs-unstable.git

Re: Status of btrfs in rawhide

2011-05-10 Thread Matej Cepl
Dne 10.5.2011 23:49, Josef Bacik napsal(a): > btrfs-progs hasn't changed much so you should be fine with whats in > fedora. If you want to be testing the latest and greatest it's > probably better to either follow Chris's btrfs-unstable.git tree or my > btrfs-work.git tree on kernel.org. Thanks,

Re: Status of btrfs in rawhide

2011-05-10 Thread Josef Bacik
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote: > Hi, > > Is rawhide following current btrfs development releases with kernel > patches and userland programs?  Or, should we role our own?  I am > interested in testing only. > btrfs-progs hasn't changed much so you should be fine with what

Status of btrfs in rawhide

2011-05-10 Thread Clyde E. Kunkel
Hi, Is rawhide following current btrfs development releases with kernel patches and userland programs? Or, should we role our own? I am interested in testing only. TIA -- Regards, OldFart -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/