Re: Standard for packaging Gtk and Qt front ends

2011-07-24 Thread Raghu Siddarth
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 5:56 AM, Rex Dieter wrote: > > 1. Use an empty "meta" package that pulls in a default (gtk) front end. > E.g > > : > > Pname (meta) -> Pname-common -> Pname-gtk > > Pname-gtk -> Pname-common and > > Pname-qt -> Pname-gtk > > > > Or, > > > > 2. Create sub packages for each

Re: Standard for packaging Gtk and Qt front ends

2011-07-23 Thread Rex Dieter
> I am packaging a program that has two front ends, one for Gtk and other for > Qt. > Is there a standard packaging structure to handle such packages? > I see two methods to do this : > > 1. Use an empty "meta" package that pulls in a default (gtk) front end. E.g > : > Pname (meta) -> Pname-common

Re: Standard for packaging Gtk and Qt front ends

2011-07-23 Thread Rajeesh K Nambiar
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 9:18 PM, Raghu Siddarth wrote: > Hello, > > I am packaging a program that has two front ends, one for Gtk and other for > Qt. > > Is there a standard packaging structure to handle such packages? I guess you can take a look at how "transmission" does this... > > I see two

Standard for packaging Gtk and Qt front ends

2011-07-23 Thread Raghu Siddarth
Hello, I am packaging a program that has two front ends, one for Gtk and other for Qt. Is there a standard packaging structure to handle such packages? I see two methods to do this : 1. Use an empty "meta" package that pulls in a default (gtk) front end. E.g : Pname (meta) -> Pname-common -> P