Re: Shorewall and kernel-modules-extra

2012-07-30 Thread Glandvador
Daniel P. Berrange redhat.com> writes: > IIUC, the point of kernel-modules-extra was to hold modules that are > not used by any Fedora applications, nor commonly needed by end users. > If Shorewall doesn't work without some of these modules, IMHO, the > modules in question should be moved back in

Re: Shorewall and kernel-modules-extra

2012-07-30 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 01:44:00PM +, Glandvador wrote: > Hi, > > Some shorewall (firewall) operations depend on several modules moved to > kernel-modules-extra package. > > Without the kernel-modules-extra package shorewall stops with errors like: > RTNETLINK answers: No such file or direct

Re: Shorewall and kernel-modules-extra

2012-07-29 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 13:44:00 +, Glandvador wrote: Some shorewall (firewall) operations depend on several modules moved to kernel-modules-extra package. So how to deal with that? From my POI, either make shorewall depending of the kernel-modules-extra or move back some of the sch_* mo

Shorewall and kernel-modules-extra

2012-07-29 Thread Glandvador
Hi, Some shorewall (firewall) operations depend on several modules moved to kernel-modules-extra package. Without the kernel-modules-extra package shorewall stops with errors like: RTNETLINK answers: No such file or directory leaving the system without network connectivity. Very fun for when upg