Re: Seeking the maintainer of dbus-python

On Thu, 2020-02-13 at 18:54 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Martin Kolman wrote: > > I wonder if this is an actual problem on Fedora ? I would assume many > > system services and applications depend on GLib, so using dasbus should > > not pull on extra dependencies in practice. > > From a distributio

Re: Seeking the maintainer of dbus-python

Martin Kolman wrote: > I wonder if this is an actual problem on Fedora ? I would assume many > system services and applications depend on GLib, so using dasbus should > not pull on extra dependencies in practice. From a distribution standpoint, the dependency on GLib is not a problem (Neal Gompa'

Re: Seeking the maintainer of dbus-python

On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 11:06 AM Martin Kolman wrote: > > On Thu, 2020-02-13 at 16:44 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Martin Kolman wrote: > > > the rather new (F32+) pure-Python dasbus DBus library > > > > LOL, don't you love fake German? ^^ > > (Actual German would be "Der Bus", not "Das Bus". ;-

Re: Seeking the maintainer of dbus-python

On Thu, 2020-02-13 at 16:44 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Martin Kolman wrote: > > the rather new (F32+) pure-Python dasbus DBus library > > LOL, don't you love fake German? ^^ > (Actual German would be "Der Bus", not "Das Bus". ;-) ) We are aware of that & and it indeed is fake German on purpose.

Re: Seeking the maintainer of dbus-python

Martin Kolman wrote: > the rather new (F32+) pure-Python dasbus DBus library LOL, don't you love fake German? ^^ (Actual German would be "Der Bus", not "Das Bus". ;-) ) And the library is not really pure-Python, it uses GLib (including, as far as I can tell, GLib/GIO's D-Bus protocol implementat

Re: Seeking the maintainer of dbus-python

On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 9:03 pm, Neal Gompa wrote: I don't think this was the library that was deprecated either. I'm pretty sure that was the libdbus-glib library, though this is unfortunately built on top of that. OK, I think I see what happened. We had a big push a couple years ago to remo

Re: Seeking the maintainer of dbus-python

On 2020-02-12 12:18, Ray Strode wrote: > hi, > > On Wednesday, February 12, 2020, Miro Hrončok wrote: >>> sure. amigadave, do you want to be comaintainer too? >> >> You can only make one person a main admin. Any co-maintainers can be > handled later by them. > > well i added neal and amigadav

Re: Seeking the maintainer of dbus-python

On 12. 02. 20 12:18, Ray Strode wrote: hi, On Wednesday, February 12, 2020, Miro Hrončok > wrote: >> sure.  amigadave, do you want to be comaintainer too? > > You can only make one person a main admin. Any co-maintainers can be handled later by them. well i add

Re: Seeking the maintainer of dbus-python

hi, On Wednesday, February 12, 2020, Miro Hrončok wrote: >> sure. amigadave, do you want to be comaintainer too? > > You can only make one person a main admin. Any co-maintainers can be handled later by them. well i added neal and amigadave as admins, too, before giving the project to vojtech.

Re: Seeking the maintainer of dbus-python

On 12. 02. 20 12:08, Ray Strode wrote: hi, On Wednesday, February 12, 2020, Miro Hrončok > wrote: > Ray, could you please give this package to to FAS user "vtrefny"? sure.  amigadave, do you want to be comaintainer too? You can only make one person a main admin.

Re: Seeking the maintainer of dbus-python

hi, On Wednesday, February 12, 2020, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Ray, could you please give this package to to FAS user "vtrefny"? sure. amigadave, do you want to be comaintainer too? Ray ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscri

Re: Seeking the maintainer of dbus-python

- Original Message - > From: "Vojtěch Trefný" > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2020 11:07:29 AM > Subject: Re: Seeking the maintainer of dbus-python > > > > On 2020-02-12 11:01, Vojtěch Trefný wrote: > >

Re: Seeking the maintainer of dbus-python

On 2/12/2020 11:01 AM, Vojtěch Trefný wrote: > If nobody wants to maintain this package I can do that. It's definitely > easier than rewriting our code to something else. I can take it, or co-maintain, whichever works for you. christopher ___ devel mail

Re: Seeking the maintainer of dbus-python

On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 5:14 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 12. 02. 20 11:01, Vojtěch Trefný wrote: > >>> This package has been deprecated for a very long time (a decade?). > >>> Nothing should be using it anymore. Either use GDBus via PyGObject, or > >>> another D-Bus client library instead. If an

Re: Seeking the maintainer of dbus-python

On 12. 02. 20 11:01, Vojtěch Trefný wrote: This package has been deprecated for a very long time (a decade?). Nothing should be using it anymore. Either use GDBus via PyGObject, or another D-Bus client library instead. If anybody wants to take this package, I'm sure that could be arranged. Workin

Re: Seeking the maintainer of dbus-python

On 2020-02-12 11:01, Vojtěch Trefný wrote: > > > On 2020-02-12 03:03, Neal Gompa wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 7:32 PM Michael Catanzaro >> wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 11:37 pm, Miro Hrončok >>> wrote: Since cca mid-2018 there was no reply from any maintainer in Bugz

Re: Seeking the maintainer of dbus-python

On ke, 12 helmi 2020, Peter Robinson wrote: > Hi, > > This package has been deprecated for a very long time (a decade?). > Nothing should be using it anymore. Either use GDBus via PyGObject, or > another D-Bus client library instead. If anybody wants to take this > package, I'm sure that could be

Re: Seeking the maintainer of dbus-python

On 2020-02-12 03:03, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 7:32 PM Michael Catanzaro > wrote: >> >> On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 11:37 pm, Miro Hrončok >> wrote: >>> Since cca mid-2018 there was no reply from any maintainer in >>> Bugzillas. >> >> Hi, >> >> This package has been deprecated fo

Re: Seeking the maintainer of dbus-python

On 12. 02. 20 2:40, Leigh Scott wrote: I have updated dbus-python as cinnamon depends on it but I don't intend to maintain it again unless I have to. Thanks for unblocking us now. However, I guess we still seek for a maintainer. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___

Re: Seeking the maintainer of dbus-python

On 12. 02. 20 1:31, Michael Catanzaro wrote: Hi, Hey, thanks for your reply. At least now I understand the situation better, yet IMHO we are not closer to get it fixed. This package has been deprecated for a very long time (a decade?). Nothing should be using it anymore. Either use GDBus vi

Re: Seeking the maintainer of dbus-python

> > Hi, > > > > This package has been deprecated for a very long time (a decade?). > > Nothing should be using it anymore. Either use GDBus via PyGObject, or > > another D-Bus client library instead. If anybody wants to take this > > package, I'm sure that could be arranged. Working out a retiremen

Re: Seeking the maintainer of dbus-python

On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 7:32 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 11:37 pm, Miro Hrončok > wrote: > > Since cca mid-2018 there was no reply from any maintainer in > > Bugzillas. > > Hi, > > This package has been deprecated for a very long time (a decade?). > Nothing should be u

Re: Seeking the maintainer of dbus-python

On 11/02/2020 22:37, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello. I am trying to figure out who maintains dbus-python in Fedora. The main admin is Ray Strode but I haven't seen any activity from Ray on that package (git log and %changelog). The default Bugzilla assignee in Fedora is "Alternative GTK desktop

Re: Seeking the maintainer of dbus-python

On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 11:37 pm, Miro Hrončok wrote: Since cca mid-2018 there was no reply from any maintainer in Bugzillas. Hi, This package has been deprecated for a very long time (a decade?). Nothing should be using it anymore. Either use GDBus via PyGObject, or another D-Bus client li

Seeking the maintainer of dbus-python

Hello. I am trying to figure out who maintains dbus-python in Fedora. The main admin is Ray Strode but I haven't seen any activity from Ray on that package (git log and %changelog). The default Bugzilla assignee in Fedora is "Alternative GTK desktop environments" I wasn't able to google this