On 26. 02. 20 12:19, Anthony Green wrote:
Thank you for all of the offers. The team that maintains glibc
(Carlos, Florian and DJ) has stepped up to help with libffi packaging.
I think that this is the right group to handle libffi for now.
Thanks!
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: m
Thank you for all of the offers. The team that maintains glibc
(Carlos, Florian and DJ) has stepped up to help with libffi packaging.
I think that this is the right group to handle libffi for now.
Thanks again,
AG
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 10:56 AM Anthony Green wrote:
>
> Hello -- I'm the curre
* Richard Shaw:
> While API/ABI breaking changes within a release is discouraged, it's
> still might be the right thing to do.
libffi within a Fedora release? That seems rather ... involved because
Python depends on it.
I don't think we'll need ABI changes for CET support, and we plan to
port C
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 9:57 AM Anthony Green wrote:
> Hello -- I'm the current Fedora maintainer for libffi, as well as the
> upstream author/maintainer. I'm looking for help with libffi
> packaging. Specifically, we need to roll out a new ABI-breaking
> release (required for ARM64 and Intel
Add me as co-maintainer, please.
I'm using libffi as dependency for a couple of packages.
On 25/02/20 16:56, Anthony Green wrote:
> Hello -- I'm the current Fedora maintainer for libffi, as well as the
> upstream author/maintainer. I'm looking for help with libffi
> packaging. Specifically, we
Hello -- I'm the current Fedora maintainer for libffi, as well as the
upstream author/maintainer. I'm looking for help with libffi
packaging. Specifically, we need to roll out a new ABI-breaking
release (required for ARM64 and Intel CET support), and I don't have
the volunteer time available to
