On Wed, 2024-08-28 at 11:52 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> I guess I'll try and patch up the app's usage of Bodhi release data and
> send a PR, that should sort it out.
https://pagure.io/fedora-packages-static/pull-request/50
--
Adam Williamson (he/him/his)
Fedora QA
Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fe
On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 12:55 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> Hah, I think I see the issue, and it's a fun one.
[snip]
My goodness! That was quite the piece of detective work there, Adam.
> Elementary, my dear Jerry. ;)
I suddenly have this mental image of you smoking a pipe and
complaining about
On Wed, 2024-08-28 at 11:29 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
>
> Upstream also objected to the license string here:
> https://packages.fedoraproject.org/pkgs/pl/pl/. According to the git
> log, the License tag was converted to SPDX in December 2022, but that
> page still shows the License tag from befor
On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 11:39 AM Maxwell G wrote:
> It's statically generated on a cronjob, I think. See the source code link at
> the bottom of the page. I think it's been broken since PDC was shut off, and
> no one has gotten around to fixing it yet.
>
> See [1] and [2]. It looks like this has
On 8/28/24 12:36 PM, Maxwell G wrote:
On 8/28/24 12:29 PM, Jerry James wrote:
Upstream also objected to the license string here:
https://packages.fedoraproject.org/pkgs/pl/pl/. According to the git
log, the License tag was converted to SPDX in December 2022, but that
page still shows the Lice
The Fedora pl package contains SWI Prolog, often abbreviated to SWIPL.
I've been talking to the lead SWIPL developer. He tells me that, as
of May this year, SWIPL development moved from Ubuntu to Fedora
because our development tools are more up to date. Let's all give
ourselves a nice pat on the
