On Mon, 5 Oct 2015, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, 5 Oct 2015 11:04:40 -0400
Paul Wouters wrote:
And openpgpkey-milter :)
And put in a TLSA record for their MX :)
I don't think it makes much sense for Fedora Infrastructure to get into
the business of being a SMTP server provider. Is this somet
Am 05.10.2015 um 17:43 schrieb Marcin Juszkiewicz:
W dniu 05.10.2015 o 16:58, Reindl Harald pisze:
Am 05.10.2015 um 16:47 schrieb Marcin Juszkiewicz:
Many of those people send their mail from properly configured MTA
allowing random envelope senders for authenticated users
well, and that's
W dniu 05.10.2015 o 16:58, Reindl Harald pisze:
Am 05.10.2015 um 16:47 schrieb Marcin Juszkiewicz:
Many of those people send their mail from properly configured MTA
allowing random envelope senders for authenticated users
well, and that's why spamfighting is that complicated
a MTA allowi
Am 05.10.2015 um 17:12 schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
On Mon, 5 Oct 2015 11:04:40 -0400
Paul Wouters wrote:
And openpgpkey-milter :)
And put in a TLSA record for their MX :)
I don't think it makes much sense for Fedora Infrastructure to get into
the business of being a SMTP server provider. Is this
On Mon, 5 Oct 2015 11:04:40 -0400
Paul Wouters wrote:
> And openpgpkey-milter :)
>
> And put in a TLSA record for their MX :)
I don't think it makes much sense for Fedora Infrastructure to get into
the business of being a SMTP server provider. Is this something that
would help forward the goals
Am 05.10.2015 um 16:47 schrieb Marcin Juszkiewicz:
W dniu 05.10.2015 o 16:43, Reindl Harald pisze:
well, that people should send their mail from the Fedora servers and
not from a wrong configured random MTA allowing random envelope
senders
Many of those people send their mail from properly c
And openpgpkey-milter :)
And put in a TLSA record for their MX :)
Paul
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 5, 2015, at 10:58, Michel Alexandre Salim
> wrote:
>
> On a related note to that, it would be great if active Fedora contributors do
> get to use an SMTP server with SPF and DKIM set up.
>
On Mon, 5 Oct 2015 16:47:09 +0200
Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> W dniu 05.10.2015 o 16:43, Reindl Harald pisze:
> > well, that people should send their mail from the Fedora servers and
> > not from a wrong configured random MTA allowing random envelope
> > senders
>
> Many of those people send the
On a related note to that, it would be great if active Fedora contributors
do get to use an SMTP server with SPF and DKIM set up.
--
Michel
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Marcin Juszkiewicz
wrote:
> W dniu 05.10.2015 o 16:43, Reindl Harald pisze:
>
>> well, that people should send their mail
W dniu 05.10.2015 o 16:43, Reindl Harald pisze:
well, that people should send their mail from the Fedora servers and
not from a wrong configured random MTA allowing random envelope
senders
Many of those people send their mail from properly configured MTA
allowing random envelope senders for au
Am 05.10.2015 um 16:16 schrieb Stephen John Smoogen:
On 4 October 2015 at 03:03, Reindl Harald wrote:
is there a reason that the list-subdomain has a SPF record but the main
domain not? now that as example "bo...@fedoraproject.org" sends a lot of
mails it would make sense to shortciruit them
On 4 October 2015 at 03:03, Reindl Harald wrote:
> is there a reason that the list-subdomain has a SPF record but the main
> domain not? now that as example "bo...@fedoraproject.org" sends a lot of
> mails it would make sense to shortciruit them as ham on spamfilters as it is
> possible for the ma
is there a reason that the list-subdomain has a SPF record but the main
domain not? now that as example "bo...@fedoraproject.org" sends a lot of
mails it would make sense to shortciruit them as ham on spamfilters as
it is possible for the mailing-lists
lists.fedoraproj
13 matches
Mail list logo
