Re: [Rust] Rust applications & i686

On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 05:12:17PM +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > So that now i686 is no longer exists (I mean as an image), is there > reason to produce i686 binaries for applications written in Rust? That > also would mean we would stop testing i686 as a platform for crates, > but I honestly love

Re: Rust applications & i686

On 7/28/19 8:55 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Sun, 28 Jul 2019 at 11:47, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > What if I want to BR some of the tools from a regular Fedora build > > in the future? Would I need to exclude i686 as well? > > Would you be able to do so now since Rust is in a module and yo

Re: Rust applications & i686

On 28. 07. 19 17:55, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On Sun, 28 Jul 2019 at 11:47, Miro Hrončok > wrote: On 28. 07. 19 17:12, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > Hello fellows, > > So that now i686 is no longer exists (I mean as an image), is there > reason

Re: Rust applications & i686

On Sun, 28 Jul 2019 at 11:47, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 28. 07. 19 17:12, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > Hello fellows, > > > > So that now i686 is no longer exists (I mean as an image), is there > > reason to produce i686 binaries for applications written in Rust? That > > also would mean we would stop

Re: Rust applications & i686

On 28. 07. 19 17:12, Igor Gnatenko wrote: Hello fellows, So that now i686 is no longer exists (I mean as an image), is there reason to produce i686 binaries for applications written in Rust? That also would mean we would stop testing i686 as a platform for crates, but I honestly love this becaus

Rust applications & i686

Hello fellows, So that now i686 is no longer exists (I mean as an image), is there reason to produce i686 binaries for applications written in Rust? That also would mean we would stop testing i686 as a platform for crates, but I honestly love this because very often builds fail due to LLVM OOM. T