Re: Rust SIG Spring Cleaning - 2025 Edition

2025-02-18 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 2:21 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Otherwise I plan to retire any Rust packages that are > - library-only / source-only and > - have been unused leaf packages for 365+ days and > - have no documented reason for why they are still needed > before the F42 Beta Freeze takes eff

Re: Rust SIG Spring Cleaning - 2025 Edition

2025-02-05 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 2:51 PM Ben Beasley wrote: > > It seems like the inclusion of rust-smallvec on this list might have > been an error, since "fedrq wr rust-smallvec*-devel" gives a very large > number of results that aren’t subpackages of rust-smallvec itself. You are correct, this should ha

Re: Rust SIG Spring Cleaning - 2025 Edition

2025-02-05 Thread Ben Beasley
It seems like the inclusion of rust-smallvec on this list might have been an error, since "fedrq wr rust-smallvec*-devel" gives a very large number of results that aren’t subpackages of rust-smallvec itself. - I know that members of the AI/ML SIG are interested in packaging python-safeten

Rust SIG Spring Cleaning - 2025 Edition

2025-02-05 Thread Fabio Valentini
Hi all, In an effort to keep the stack of Rust crate packages in good shape in Fedora, I'm regularly checking for library-only packages that have been unused for extended periods of time (usually 365+ days, i.e. two full release cycles). Dropping packages like this reduces the maintenance effort