On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 2:21 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> Otherwise I plan to retire any Rust packages that are
> - library-only / source-only and
> - have been unused leaf packages for 365+ days and
> - have no documented reason for why they are still needed
> before the F42 Beta Freeze takes eff
On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 2:51 PM Ben Beasley wrote:
>
> It seems like the inclusion of rust-smallvec on this list might have
> been an error, since "fedrq wr rust-smallvec*-devel" gives a very large
> number of results that aren’t subpackages of rust-smallvec itself.
You are correct, this should ha
?
xcb:used to be dependency of x11-clipboard
(replaced with x11rb)
If there is a package in this list that is still needed for something
that you're working on, please let me know soon, and I will add it to
the list here:
https://pagure.io/ironthree/fedora-rust-sig-l
aced with deunicode)
vec1: ?
xcb:used to be dependency of x11-clipboard
(replaced with x11rb)
If there is a package in this list that is still needed for something
that you're working on, please let me know soon, and I will add it to
the list here:
https://pagure.io/iront
On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 9:29 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> As discussed in the Fedora Rust channel on Matrix, I am planning to do
> a mini-mass-rebuild of all Rust applications (that are co-maintained
> by the Rust SIG), likely by the end of this week. I estim
Hi all,
As discussed in the Fedora Rust channel on Matrix, I am planning to do
a mini-mass-rebuild of all Rust applications (that are co-maintained
by the Rust SIG), likely by the end of this week. I estimate that it
will involve just shy of 200 packages per branch.
The motivation for a mini
regards,
bex
>
> > regards,
> >
> > bex
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On 07/27/2018 04:04 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> >> > Hello,
> >> >
> >> > it seems to be a week of SIG announcements, so why shouldn't I share
gt; >
>> > it seems to be a week of SIG announcements, so why shouldn't I share that
>> > we also have Rust SIG <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Rust>.
>> >
>> > At this point we have over 400 crates packaged, few applications like
>> > ripgrep
atenko wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > it seems to be a week of SIG announcements, so why shouldn't I share that
> > we also have Rust SIG <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Rust>.
> >
> > At this point we have over 400 crates packaged, few applications like
>
Do you plan any hackfest during Flock?
On 07/27/2018 04:04 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> Hello,
>
> it seems to be a week of SIG announcements, so why shouldn't I share that
> we also have Rust SIG <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Rust>.
>
> At this point we have
Hello,
it seems to be a week of SIG announcements, so why shouldn't I share that
we also have Rust SIG <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Rust>.
At this point we have over 400 crates packaged, few applications like
ripgrep, tokei, stratisd and more.
IRC: #fedora
On 06/16/2017 11:31 AM, K. Cong wrote:
> What about rustup? I feel it's quite important for anyone working in Rust.
I think rustup is great for managing rustc versions, and I do use it
myself, but I don't think it's a good fit for system packaging. It
wants to be interposed in your PATH with shim
On 16/06/17 12:49, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> on behalf of Rust SIG[0] I'm happy to announce that recently we
> migrated our package builds to COPR repository[1] and would like to ask
> you which tool(s) you would like to see there (obviously, those should
Quoting Igor Gnatenko (2017-06-16 12:49:21)
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hello everybody,
>
> on behalf of Rust SIG[0] I'm happy to announce that recently we
> migrated our package builds to COPR repository[1] and would like to ask
> you wh
> On 16. Jun 2017, at 12:49, Igor Gnatenko
> wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hello everybody,
>
> on behalf of Rust SIG[0] I'm happy to announce that recently we
> migrated our package builds to COPR repository[1] and would
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hello everybody,
on behalf of Rust SIG[0] I'm happy to announce that recently we
migrated our package builds to COPR repository[1] and would like to ask
you which tool(s) you would like to see there (obviously, those should
be written in Rust)
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 8:02 AM, Jan Synacek wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Igor Gnatenko
> wrote:
>> Hello everybody,
>>
>> we are establishing new SIG for Rust[0]. Feel free to join us on IRC
>> (#fedora-rust) and/or Mailing List (r...@lists.fedoraproject.org).
>>
>> Help with improvi
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> we are establishing new SIG for Rust[0]. Feel free to join us on IRC
> (#fedora-rust) and/or Mailing List (r...@lists.fedoraproject.org).
>
> Help with improving our wiki page is very welcomed ;)
>
> [0] https://fedorapro
Hello everybody,
we are establishing new SIG for Rust[0]. Feel free to join us on IRC
(#fedora-rust) and/or Mailing List (r...@lists.fedoraproject.org).
Help with improving our wiki page is very welcomed ;)
[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Rust
--
-Igor Gnatenko
signature.asc
Descriptio
19 matches
Mail list logo
