Re: [fedora-java] Roadmap for Java things in Fedora

2012-03-09 Thread Aleksandar Kurtakov
- Original Message - > From: "Stanislav Ochotnicky" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Friday, March 9, 2012 11:58:39 AM > Subject: Re: [fedora-java] Roadmap for Java things in Fedora > > Quoting Garrett Holmstrom (20

Re: [fedora-java] Roadmap for Java things in Fedora

2012-03-09 Thread Stanislav Ochotnicky
Quoting Garrett Holmstrom (2012-03-08 23:11:26) >On Mar 7, 2012 7:54 AM, "Stanislav Ochotnicky" >wrote: >> - Remove mention of maven2 in guidelines since all supported versions >>have maven-3.x. Some other small cleanups as well perhaps > >Is there already a separate set of java guidelines fo

Re: [fedora-java] Roadmap for Java things in Fedora

2012-03-08 Thread Garrett Holmstrom
On Mar 7, 2012 7:54 AM, "Stanislav Ochotnicky" wrote: > - Remove mention of maven2 in guidelines since all supported versions >have maven-3.x. Some other small cleanups as well perhaps Is there already a separate set of java guidelines for EPEL? If there isn't does this mean we should create

Re: Roadmap for Java things in Fedora

2012-03-08 Thread Bill Nottingham
Aleksandar Kurtakov (akurt...@redhat.com) said: > I'm pretty sure that Bill ment dropping it from the various packages so gcj > is not brought on regular user machine, make packages noarch and etc. not to > drop gcj itself. If this was the question - gcj_support has been removed from > most of

Re: Roadmap for Java things in Fedora

2012-03-08 Thread Aleksandar Kurtakov
- Original Message - > From: "Andrew Haley" > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Thursday, March 8, 2012 1:38:21 PM > Subject: Re: Roadmap for Java things in Fedora > > On 03/07/2012 04:34 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > Any plans for sunsetti

Re: Roadmap for Java things in Fedora

2012-03-08 Thread Andrew Haley
On 03/07/2012 04:34 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Any plans for sunsetting GCJ? That's an interesting question. It's still useful in a number of niche roles: for example, it's used in PDFTK. Also, it would have been very hard to bootstrap OpenJDK onto ARM without it. For that reason, it's on my

Re: Roadmap for Java things in Fedora

2012-03-07 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 03/07/2012 10:02 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: Quoting Orion Poplawski (2012-03-07 17:48:37) On 03/07/2012 08:53 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: Hi, I believe it might be nice to get everyone up to speed on what is happening in Java world in Fedora and what is planned in near future. 1.

Re: Roadmap for Java things in Fedora

2012-03-07 Thread Stanislav Ochotnicky
Quoting Orion Poplawski (2012-03-07 17:48:37) >On 03/07/2012 08:53 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I believe it might be nice to get everyone up to speed on what is >> happening in Java world in Fedora and what is planned in near future. >> >> 1. Packaging guidelines updates >> >>

Re: Roadmap for Java things in Fedora

2012-03-07 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 03/07/2012 08:53 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: Hi, I believe it might be nice to get everyone up to speed on what is happening in Java world in Fedora and what is planned in near future. 1. Packaging guidelines updates - Update JNI part of the guidelines to reflect current practice. T

Re: Roadmap for Java things in Fedora

2012-03-07 Thread Bill Nottingham
Stanislav Ochotnicky (sochotni...@redhat.com) said: > I believe it might be nice to get everyone up to speed on what is > happening in Java world in Fedora and what is planned in near future. > > 1. Packaging guidelines updates > - I'd like to add guidelines for packaging compat libraries. Mave

Roadmap for Java things in Fedora

2012-03-07 Thread Stanislav Ochotnicky
Hi, I believe it might be nice to get everyone up to speed on what is happening in Java world in Fedora and what is planned in near future. 1. Packaging guidelines updates - I'd like to add guidelines for packaging compat libraries. Maven already has support for this (see [1]) so I'd like