Re: Reviews needed

2019-01-02 Thread Neal Gompa
hat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1663037 > > They're very small, very simple packages. Should take about a minute to > review. > > Will trade reviews or other packaging favors. > I'll grab these. In the near future, I will have reviews needed for getting Cavil into Fedora.

Reviews needed

2019-01-02 Thread Tom Callaway
When I wasn't looking, asymptote grew a new dependency, which means I have two new packages that need reviews. python-speg: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1663036 python-cson: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1663037 They're very small, very simple packages. Should take ab

Re: Python reviews needed

2013-05-02 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Hi On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > I have some python packages that need reviewing: > > python-traitsui - > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/**show_bug.cgi?id=829580 > python-envisage - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.

Python reviews needed

2013-05-01 Thread Orion Poplawski
I have some python packages that need reviewing: python-traitsui - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829580 python-envisage - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958523 There may be more to come in the dep chain as well. These are needed to repair the broken Mayavi visualizat

netcdf 4.2 update coming - package split, reviews needed

2012-03-06 Thread Orion Poplawski
I'm building netcdf 4.2-rc2 in rawhide now. This splits out the C++ and Fortran APIs into separate packages. Not sure I have time to do a swap, but I need the following reviews done: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742605 - netcdf-cxx4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=7

Re: Quite a few reviews needed :)

2011-06-29 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 20:13 +0200, Mario Blättermann wrote: > Am 27.06.2011 20:03, schrieb Ankur Sinha: > > Hello, > > > > I've recently been packaging applications for the fedora medical > > initiative. There are quite a few of them. If you have some time to > > spare, please review a few (or jus

Re: Quite a few reviews needed :)

2011-06-28 Thread Mario Blättermann
Am 27.06.2011 20:03, schrieb Ankur Sinha: > Hello, > > I've recently been packaging applications for the fedora medical > initiative. There are quite a few of them. If you have some time to > spare, please review a few (or just one). Even if you're not a sponsored > packager, I encourage you to pl

Re: Package Reviews Needed

2011-06-07 Thread Athmane Madjoudj
On 06/07/2011 12:29 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 03:12:19PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> Tom Callaway wrote: >>> pyrit: >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691894 >> >> Oh great, because a tool to parasite wireless connections which the >> owners went out of

Re: Package Reviews Needed

2011-06-07 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 03:12:19PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Tom Callaway wrote: > > pyrit: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691894 > > Oh great, because a tool to parasite wireless connections which the > owners went out of the way to secure with the best available protocol is

Re: Package Reviews Needed

2011-06-07 Thread Casey Dahlin
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 03:12:19PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Tom Callaway wrote: > > pyrit: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691894 > > Oh great, because a tool to parasite wireless connections which the > owners went out of the way to secure with the best available protocol is

Re: Package Reviews Needed

2011-06-07 Thread Kevin Kofler
Tom Callaway wrote: > pyrit: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691894 Oh great, because a tool to parasite wireless connections which the owners went out of the way to secure with the best available protocol is EXACTLY what we need… Use of this tool is probably against the law in mo

Re: Package Reviews Needed

2011-06-06 Thread Garrett Holmstrom
On 2011-06-06 11:17, Tom Callaway wrote: > As usual, I will swap reviews or favors (within limits) for reviews on > some new packages for me: > > mono-reflection: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711181 > > pyrit: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691894 > > gambas3: > http

Package Reviews Needed

2011-06-06 Thread Tom Callaway
As usual, I will swap reviews or favors (within limits) for reviews on some new packages for me: mono-reflection: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711181 pyrit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691894 gambas3: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710203 As soon as I