Hello, I have a python package pending review, it's required to
upgrade APLpy to version 2.1. I'm happy to review other package in
return.
python-PyAVM - Python package to handle Astronomy Visualization Metadata
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2213588
Best, Sergio
--
___
> Hey, I'll review web-eid in coming week.
> Could you take a look at python-ownet review?
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256125
Sure! Thank you very much
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send
On Sun, Aug 04, 2024 at 05:23:57PM -, Germano Massullo wrote:
> > Bug 2246454 - Review Request: python-pyxlsb2 - Excel 2007+ Binary Workbook
> > (xlsb) parser
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246454
>
> I will take this one.
> Can you please review this package?
> web-eid - We
Ops I did not notice that python-pyxlsb2 review was already taken care by
another person
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs
> Bug 2246454 - Review Request: python-pyxlsb2 - Excel 2007+ Binary Workbook
> (xlsb) parser
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246454
I will take this one.
Can you please review this package?
web-eid - Web eID browser extension helper application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.
Dne 31. 07. 24 v 11:50 odp. Michal Ambroz napsal(a):
*# Bug 2246704 - Review Request: python-xlrd2 - Library to extract data from Microsoft Excel legacy spreadsheet files
*(xls)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246704
I take this.
If you can do review of
https://bugzilla.redhat
Hello,
please would be somebody having some spare time to review some of 3 new
package requests needed for the upgrade of the python-oletools package to
current version 0.60.2 ?
For some time I am trying to get to fedora update to current version of
oletools, but it requires some new python dep
On 8/29/23 13:40, Ankur Sinha wrote:
Hi folks,
Would someone like to swap reviews please? I'd like to get
python-pygments-git reviewed. They are pygments lexers for git output
and files. The review is here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2229721
It should be a simple review, so un
Hi folks,
Would someone like to swap reviews please? I'd like to get
python-pygments-git reviewed. They are pygments lexers for git output
and files. The review is here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2229721
It should be a simple review, so unofficial reviews from folks looking
to
Hi folks,
Would someone like to swap reviews please? I'd like to get
python-formulaic reviewed and included in Fedora[1]. It's required to
update python-pybids to the latest version[2]
It should be a straightforward review. Unofficial reviews from candidate
package maintainers looking for review
On Thu, 2022-02-17 at 13:46 -0500, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> Your email made me look at this upstream
> (https://github.com/packit/specfile). It looks interesting! I wonder
> if we could use it more broadly (like for pyrpkg). It reminds me of
> https://github.com/containerbuildsystem/dockerfile-parse .
>
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 4:09 AM Nikola Forró wrote:
> Hello,
>
> is there anybody willing to review python-specfile [1]?
Your email made me look at this upstream
(https://github.com/packit/specfile). It looks interesting! I wonder
if we could use it more broadly (like for pyrpkg). It reminds me o
Hello,
is there anybody willing to review python-specfile [1]?
I'd be happy to review a package of similar complexity in return.
Thanks,
Nikola
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2054599
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject
I have proposed a python-colored-traceback package at:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033730
Would anyone like to do a review swap?
I am anxious to get python-colored-traceback reviewed, because the
existing python-pwntools package will require python-colored-traceback
with
On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 09:38:44 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 10:26:07AM +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > Would anyone like to swap reviews please? I'd like to get python-pathos
> > reviewed. It is required to update python-SALib to the latest rel
On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 10:26:07AM +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Would anyone like to swap reviews please? I'd like to get python-pathos
> reviewed. It is required to update python-SALib to the latest release
> (and fix its FTI/FTBFS).
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2
Hi folks,
Would anyone like to swap reviews please? I'd like to get python-pathos
reviewed. It is required to update python-SALib to the latest release
(and fix its FTI/FTBFS).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000598
It should be a relatively straight forward review. It uses the new
On 06/07/2021 21:06, Ankur Sinha wrote:
Hi folks,
Would someone like to swap reviews please? I've got a trivial Python
package that needs to be reviewed. It's a new BR for the new version of
python-pyscaffold that's currently FTBFS and is blocking a couple of
packages in rawhide.
Review here: h
Hi folks,
Would someone like to swap reviews please? I've got a trivial Python
package that needs to be reviewed. It's a new BR for the new version of
python-pyscaffold that's currently FTBFS and is blocking a couple of
packages in rawhide.
Review here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id
Hi folks,
One of our NeuroFedora packages has added a new dep in its new version,
which FTBFS as a result. Would someone like to swap reviews please?
1976640 – Review Request: python-lfpykit - Electrostatic models for
multicompartment neuron models
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1
On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 14:14, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 13:07:06 +0100, Andy Mender wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hiya Ankur!
>
> Hi Andy!
>
> > I reviewed your package. No swap expected, but could you push your
> > gargi-fonts package to Rawhide?
> > I'm working on an update to Widelands a
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 13:07:06 +0100, Andy Mender wrote:
>
>
> Hiya Ankur!
Hi Andy!
> I reviewed your package. No swap expected, but could you push your
> gargi-fonts package to Rawhide?
> I'm working on an update to Widelands and I might need it :).
Thanks very much! I'll complete the review a
On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 11:07, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I hope everyone is safe and doing well.
>
> python-meautility is a new dependency needed to update python-lfpy to
> its latest release, so I've packaged it up and submitted a package
> review here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_b
Hi folks,
I hope everyone is safe and doing well.
python-meautility is a new dependency needed to update python-lfpy to
its latest release, so I've packaged it up and submitted a package
review here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1902102
It's a standard Python package. Would anyone
Hello,
Would anyone like to swap reviews please? I've got another package ready
for inclusion in NeuroFedora:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1882527
"1882527 – Review Request: python-sklearn-nature-inspired-algorithms - Nature
Inspired Algorithms for scikit-learn"
--
Thanks,
Rega
Hello,
I'm working on packaging NetPyNE[1] for NeuroFedora next, a tool used
for simulation and analysis of neuroscientific computational models
using the NEURON simulator. It's first dependency is the python-bokeh
web-visualisation library[2]. Would someone like to swap reviews please?
https://b
Hello,
I've got a new NeuroFedora package for review, python-niapy:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1851634
Would anyone like to swap reviews please?
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) |
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone: Europe/Lon
Looking for someone to review the following python package:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839242
It's not complicated by any means.
I'll be glad to review another package in return. Thank you.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedora
Hello,
Would anyone like to swap simple reviews please? I'd like to get
python-spyking-circus reviewed for NeuroFedora:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827948
Description:
SpyKING CIRCUS is a python code to allow fast spike sorting on multi channel
recordings. A publication on the a
Hello,
Would anyone like to swap a review please? I'd like to get "STEPS"
reviewed for inclusion in NeuroFedora:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821069
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) |
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone: Europe/
Hello,
Here's a trivial review if anyone would like to swap for another easy
review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770496
If you are a new packager or looking to be sponsored to the packager
team, please feel free to review this one unofficially for practice too.
--
Thanks,
Regar
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019, 03:32 Ankur Sinha wrote:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763597
>
I'll trade you for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763261
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
Hello,
It finally built, and I have a review up here if anyone would like to
swap reviews:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763597
Thanks for your help, everyone,
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) |
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zo
On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 11:35:44 +0200, Tomas Korbar wrote:
> Hi,
> I could take this review. I hope you do not mind that i do not have package in
> need of review.
Not at all, please proceed :)
--
Thanks very much,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) |
https://fedoraproject.org/wik
Hi,
I could take this review. I hope you do not mind that i do not have package
in need of review.
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 10:21 AM Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Would anyone like to swap reviews please? python-SALib needs review for
> inclusion in NeuroFedora:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/s
Hello,
Would anyone like to swap reviews please? python-SALib needs review for
inclusion in NeuroFedora:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1737770
It's a relatively simple package. Folks looking for sponsorship, please
feel free to review it unofficially too.
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Anku
On 25.10.2018 21:17, Ankur Sinha wrote:
Hello,
Would someone like to swap reviews please? I have a simple python
package that needs reviewing:
python-libNeuroML: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643266
I've taken it. No need for any review in return.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +42
Hello,
Would someone like to swap reviews please? I have a simple python
package that needs reviewing:
python-libNeuroML: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643266
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD"
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone: Europe/London
python-cypari2 - A Python interface to the number theory library pari
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511554
This package is basically previous sagemath pari interfaces, no
as a standalone package.
It is required to update to sagemath 8.0
Thanks,
Paulo
___
Hello,
Another simple python package that I'd like reviewed - would someone
like to swap reviews please? :)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1507235
(It's holding up the update of another package: mpdris2)
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD"
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/
Hello,
Would anyone like to swap reviews? python-rstcheck is a rather simple
python package, so I'd be happy to review a similar package in return.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506405
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD"
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
On Tue, 2016-09-27 at 12:47 +0200, Germano Massullo wrote:
> Taken!
> Could you review my https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=13752
> 22
> Thank you
Thanks! Taken! :)
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD"
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
signature.asc
Description: Th
Taken!
Could you review my https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375222
Thank you
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hello,
Would have a simple review ticket to swap? I'd be happy to take one in
exchange for this python package:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379651
(python-feedgenerator)
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD"
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
signature.asc
2016-06-15 14:43 GMT-06:00 Avram Lubkin :
> I have a couple of simple Python packages that need to be reviewed. Will
> review yours in return.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347006:
> python-sphinxcontrib-spelling
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1340619: python-imag
I have a couple of simple Python packages that need to be reviewed. Will
review yours in return.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347006:
python-sphinxcontrib-spelling
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1340619: python-imagesize
Thanks,
Avram
--
devel mailing list
devel@list
2014-09-25 16:36 GMT+02:00 Darryl L. Pierce :
> I have a package I'd like to get reviewed and will swap a review with
> someone else to get it done.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146575
>
If you can't find anybody to swap with, take *any* pending review and
ping me, I'll review
I have a package I'd like to get reviewed and will swap a review with
someone else to get it done.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146575
--
Darryl L. Pierce
http://mcpierce.blogspot.com/
Famous last words:
"I wonder what happens if we do it this way?"
pgpaSfOxFf7KV.pgp
Descri
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 3:36 AM, Sergio Pascual wrote:
> Could you review python-dill?
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1140577
>
> Thank you
Sure. Thanks, Sergio!
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapro
2014-09-10 23:36 GMT+02:00 Jerry James :
> Is anyone up for a review swap? I need python-gmpy2, which is a
> successor to the existing gmpy package.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138892
>
> Let me know what I can review for you in return.
>
Could you review python-dill?
https
2014-09-10 23:36 GMT+02:00 Jerry James :
> Is anyone up for a review swap? I need python-gmpy2, which is a
> successor to the existing gmpy package.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138892
>
>
I will take it. It was in my packaging queue anyway
> Let me know what I can review fo
Is anyone up for a review swap? I need python-gmpy2, which is a
successor to the existing gmpy package.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138892
Let me know what I can review for you in return.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.o
Hi,
I just submitted the package-catkin_lint for review. Please feel free to
swap reviews :)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084681
I haven't been able to get the tests in the source to run yet. Any
pointers there will be appreciated.
--
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur (FranciscoD)
ht
> Original Message -
> From: "Tim Bielawa"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2014 5:54:09 PM
> Subject: Review swap: python-bitmath
>
>
> Would like to do a review swap on this package. I'm most useful when it
Would like to do a review swap on this package. I'm most useful when it
comes to python packages.
https://github.com/tbielawa/bitmath
Brief description to pique your interest:
> bitmath simplifies many facets of interacting with file sizes in
> various units. Examples include: converting betwe
Hi, I have this review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051254
Its python-patsy, to use R like formula language in Python
I will review other package in return.
Thanks, Sergio
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Swap with: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006860
WIll be "Ready" soon.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Hi,
I need python-sphinx-theme-better to build the python-pillow docs,
review is here [1]. Should be very quick and easy. Happy to review in
exchange.
Thanks,
Sandro
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048045
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fe
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Christopher Meng wrote:
> Swap with this one:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957347
Thanks for the review, I'll review yours next year ;)
> Thanks.
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailma
Swap with this one:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957347
Thanks.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Dridi Boukelmoune
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>> Út 17. prosinec 2013, 14:13:30 CET, Dridi Boukelmoune napsal:
>>>
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=python-webcolors
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=py
Deal.
I will review yours later.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Taken
2013/12/18 Christopher Meng
> Swap with https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033433 if you like.
>
> I need to handle these remaining bugs now.
>
> Thanks.
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora C
Swap with https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033433 if you like.
I need to handle these remaining bugs now.
Thanks.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduc
Hello, I have this review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014738
and I'll be happy to review other package in return
Thanks, Sergio
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraprojec
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Út 17. prosinec 2013, 14:13:30 CET, Dridi Boukelmoune napsal:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=python-webcolors
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=python-funcparserlib
>
> So I take them and you ow me two, ok?
Dea
Út 17. prosinec 2013, 14:13:30 CET, Dridi Boukelmoune napsal:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=python-webcolors
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=python-funcparserlib
So I take them and you ow me two, ok?
Good news, those packages are already python3-ready, as are blockdia
Hello,
I've recently solved problems *easily* thanks to python (I'm not yet a
python person) so I thought I would give it some love and pick a
python package from the wish list.
I've chosen blockdiag, which I actually might start using (along with
its friends seqdiag, actdiag and nwdiag) so first
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 08:41:55AM -0400, Martin Krizek wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Stephen Gallagher"
> > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
> >
> > Cc: "Martin Krizek"
> > Sent: Friday, Octobe
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 08:41:55AM -0400, Martin Krizek wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Stephen Gallagher"
> > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
> >
> > Cc: "Martin Krizek"
> > Sent: Friday, Octobe
- Original Message -
> From: "Stephen Gallagher"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Cc: "Martin Krizek"
> Sent: Friday, October 4, 2013 2:33:50 PM
> Subject: Re: Review swap: python-jsmin, python-cssmin
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/04/2013 07:57 AM, Martin Krizek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> anyone willing to review or swap reviews?
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014607
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014601
>
> Thanks! Martin
>
Has JSMin finally
Hi,
anyone willing to review or swap reviews?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014607
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014601
Thanks!
Martin
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 06:40:34PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
> On 25.09.2013 18:25, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> >I'm willing to do a review swap if someone will review
> >python-qpid_messaging:
> >
> >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012077
> >
> >
> Hi,
>
> I'll do it for perl-Parse-Deb
On 25.09.2013 18:25, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
I'm willing to do a review swap if someone will review
python-qpid_messaging:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012077
Hi,
I'll do it for perl-Parse-DebControl [1].
Thanks,
Sandro
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=100999
I'm willing to do a review swap if someone will review
python-qpid_messaging:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012077
--
Darryl L. Pierce
http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/
"What do you care what people think, Mr. Feynman?"
pgp1TszbUo8eW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mai
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 9:02 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 20:23 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> > On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 21:06:43 -0400
>> > Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> >
>> >> How do I tell if it went through a mash yet?
>> >
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 20:23 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 21:06:43 -0400
> > Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >
> >> How do I tell if it went through a mash yet?
> >
> > The rawhide compose starts at 08:15 UTC each day.
> >
> > If
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 21:06:43 -0400
> Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
>> How do I tell if it went through a mash yet?
>
> The rawhide compose starts at 08:15 UTC each day.
>
> If it's before then, you are ok.
In that case, as of this writing, 'koji
On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 21:06:43 -0400
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> How do I tell if it went through a mash yet?
The rawhide compose starts at 08:15 UTC each day.
If it's before then, you are ok.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
h
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 19:55 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >
> >
> > So, unfortunately I didn't do my homework and I discovered (after
> > getting this package reviewed, approved and committed), that they broke
> > API in a recent minor releas
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 09:16 +0200, Matthias Runge wrote:
>> On 03/08/12 22:29, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845681
>> >
>> > It's a fairly trivial python/Django package, needed for supporting th
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 09:16 +0200, Matthias Runge wrote:
> On 03/08/12 22:29, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845681
> >
> > It's a fairly trivial python/Django package, needed for supporting the
> > new version of ReviewBoard (which is currently nonfunctio
On 03/08/12 22:29, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845681
>
> It's a fairly trivial python/Django package, needed for supporting the
> new version of ReviewBoard (which is currently nonfunctional in F17/F18
> because the previous version is incompatible with
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845681
It's a fairly trivial python/Django package, needed for supporting the
new version of ReviewBoard (which is currently nonfunctional in F17/F18
because the previous version is incompatible with Django 1.4).
I'll happily review a similarly simple p
Hi,
I'm new to fedora devel, so please forgive me if I'm not following the right
procedure.
I'm offering a review swap for python-rtkit[1] - Python Api for Request
Tracker's REST interface.
As I'm not a packager yet, I can only offer informal review.
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?
On Wed 26 Oct 2011 10:14:06 AM EDT, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Brett Lentz wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Hello -
>>
>> I've been waiting for someone to review my package submission for
>> about a week now.
>>
>> Request is he
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Brett Lentz wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello -
>
> I've been waiting for someone to review my package submission for
> about a week now.
>
> Request is here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747050
>
> I'd be happy to d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello -
I've been waiting for someone to review my package submission for
about a week now.
Request is here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747050
I'd be happy to do a review swap or make some other deal to get my
package reviewed.
Tha
On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 12:18 +1000, Brendan Jones wrote:
> I can take this on - I use HL7 extensively at work. I will send
> through
> mine for review shortly.
>
> regards,
>
> Brendan
>
>
Thanks! :D
--
Regards,
Ankur: "FranciscoD"
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
http://dodoin
On 15/07/11 12:06, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Anyone for a review swap?
>
> python-hl7 - Python library parsing HL7 v2.x and v3.x messages
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722249
>
> It's a pretty straight forward review.
>
> rpmlint outpu
Hello!
Anyone for a review swap?
python-hl7 - Python library parsing HL7 v2.x and v3.x messages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722249
It's a pretty straight forward review.
rpmlint output:
[ankur@ankur SRPMS]$ rpmlint ../SPECS/python-hl7.spec
python-hl7-0.1.1_
I have a _very_ small package I've put up for review. Would someone with
a similarly easy-to-review package like to do a review swap?
My BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620862
--
Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc.
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat rank
93 matches
Mail list logo
