Kevin, oclock was not updated, and Beson's email made me realize that I could
go an do it myself. I did that by the time you check. slim's was updated and
both packages are now in testing.
Best,
Ranjan
On Sunday, May 14, 2023 at 10:49:44 AM CDT, Kevin Fenzi
wrote:
On Sun, May 14, 2
On Sun, May 14, 2023 at 02:04:57PM +0300, Benson Muite wrote:
> Ranjan,
>
> On 5/14/23 13:46, Globe Trotter via devel wrote:
> > Thanks! The package was cleared on BZ some time ago. Is there some
> > additional review that is needed?
> >
> Sorry, that is correct. Usually state is set to post. I
Ranjan,
On 5/14/23 13:46, Globe Trotter via devel wrote:
> Thanks! The package was cleared on BZ some time ago. Is there some
> additional review that is needed?
>
Sorry, that is correct. Usually state is set to post. It seems to have
been unretired:
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11417
Though
On 14-05-2023 12:40, Benson Muite wrote:
It seems it is just the review that is needed:
The re-review is done:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2025138
Releng unretiring the package is the next step, really.
-- Sandro
___
devel mailing l
Benson,
Thanks! The package was cleared on BZ some time ago. Is there some additional
review that is needed?
Best wishes,
Ranjan
On Sunday, May 14, 2023 at 05:41:35 AM CDT, Benson Muite
wrote:
Hi Ranjan,
Thanks for contributing to Fedora and maintaining packages.
On 5/14/23 03:27,
On 14-05-2023 00:45, Globe Trotter via devel wrote:
Thanks, Sandro! How does one ping in the ticket on paguire?
The easiest way is to just leave a comment in the ticket. If you need
info from a specific person you would tag that person (@fas_user). That
ensures people watching the ticket queu
Hi Ranjan,
Thanks for contributing to Fedora and maintaining packages.
On 5/14/23 03:27, Globe Trotter via devel wrote:
> Thanks, Kevin! No problem, no rush, I did not quite know what to expect,
> hence the questions. Thanks again!
>
>
It seems it is just the review that is needed:
https://do
Thanks, Kevin! No problem, no rush, I did not quite know what to expect, hence
the questions. Thanks again!
On Saturday, May 13, 2023 at 06:12:33 PM CDT, Kevin Fenzi
wrote:
On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 02:41:10AM +0200, Sandro wrote:
> On 11-05-2023 17:57, Globe Trotter via devel wrote:
On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 02:41:10AM +0200, Sandro wrote:
> On 11-05-2023 17:57, Globe Trotter via devel wrote:
> > Still no movement on my unretire requests for both slim and oclock, not
> > even a request for additional information.
>
> Tags have been added to the ticket. So, it has come up in on
Thanks, Sandro! How does one ping in the ticket on paguire?
On Friday, May 12, 2023 at 07:41:47 PM CDT, Sandro wrote:
On 11-05-2023 17:57, Globe Trotter via devel wrote:
> Still no movement on my unretire requests for both slim and oclock, not even
> a request for additional information.
On 11-05-2023 17:57, Globe Trotter via devel wrote:
Still no movement on my unretire requests for both slim and oclock, not even a
request for additional information.
Tags have been added to the ticket. So, it has come up in one of the
meetings. Supposedly, no-one has found the time yet to wo
Still no movement on my unretire requests for both slim and oclock, not even a
request for additional information.
On Sunday, May 7, 2023 at 10:50:42 AM CDT, Sandro wrote:
On 07-05-2023 17:34, Globe Trotter via devel wrote:
> How long does it take to unretire a package? I was thinking th
I see, thanks! I had indeed forgotten that the previous request had been closed.
On Sunday, May 7, 2023 at 10:50:42 AM CDT, Sandro wrote:
On 07-05-2023 17:34, Globe Trotter via devel wrote:
> How long does it take to unretire a package? I was thinking that it
> was automatic, but I have n
On 07-05-2023 17:34, Globe Trotter via devel wrote:
How long does it take to unretire a package? I was thinking that it
was automatic, but I have not received any notification yet. Did this
request last evening.
I don't think it's fully automated. It's a member of the releng team
that has to p
How long does it take to unretire a package? I was thinking that it was
automatic, but I have not received any notification yet. Did this request last
evening.
On Saturday, May 6, 2023 at 07:25:30 PM CDT, Globe Trotter via devel
wrote:
Thank you for this. I got:
fedpkg import ~/rpmb
Thank you for this. I got:
fedpkg import ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/oclock-1.0.4-4.fc37.src.rpm
Removing no longer used file: dead.package
Could not execute import_srpm: This package or module is retired. The action
has stopped.
so I guess I have request unretirement. I thought I did it sometime ago, but
On 06-05-2023 23:43, Sandro wrote:
On 06-05-2023 19:36, Globe Trotter via devel wrote:
Can someone please review the oclock package? This was orphaned after
F35, and I packaged it for myself, and then would like to put it up.
It was tentatively approved, but never finally done so. Thanks!
Look
On 06-05-2023 19:36, Globe Trotter via devel wrote:
Can someone please review the oclock package? This was orphaned after
F35, and I packaged it for myself, and then would like to put it up.
It was tentatively approved, but never finally done so. Thanks!
Looks like the package is approved. The
Sorry, forgot the BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2025138
On Saturday, May 6, 2023 at 12:36:20 PM CDT, Globe Trotter
wrote:
Can someone please review the oclock package? This was orphaned after F35, and
I packaged it for myself, and then would like to put it up. It was
Can someone please review the oclock package? This was orphaned after F35, and
I packaged it for myself, and then would like to put it up. It was tentatively
approved, but never finally done so. Thanks!
On Tuesday, November 23, 2021 at 02:43:00 PM CST, Björn Persson
wrote:
Ben Beasley
Hi,
Globe Trotter via devel writes:
> Thank you to Dan Čermák for reviewing this package. However, I had two
> questions from his comments. The first was that the spec file should use
> gpgverify.
> So, I went to the suggested webpage:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guideli
Ben Beasley wrote:
> Please compare with
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xfontsel/blob/rawhide/f/xfontsel.spec,
> paying close attention to the comments in the spec file. SKS keyservers have
> gone offline since that package obtained its keyring, so try using
> hkps://keys.openpgp.org inst
Wonderful, thank you! This is the sort of pointer I was looking for. I will now
try it.
On Monday, November 22, 2021, 07:05:13 PM CST, Ben Beasley
wrote:
Please compare with
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xfontsel/blob/rawhide/f/xfontsel.spec,
paying close attention to the comment
Please compare with
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xfontsel/blob/rawhide/f/xfontsel.spec,
paying close attention to the comments in the spec file. SKS keyservers have
gone offline since that package obtained its keyring, so try using
hkps://keys.openpgp.org instead.
That package also uses
Thank you to Dan Čermák for reviewing this package. However, I had two
questions from his comments. The first was that the spec file should use
gpgverify.
So, I went to the suggested webpage:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_source_file_verification
and did the follow
Hello,
Anyone willing to review this request for a recently (>8 weeks) orphaned
package?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2025138
Happy to review in return.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an emai
Yes, indeed, stupid me. I neglected to post the bugzilla request.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2025138
Sorry.
Best wishes,
aa...@fedoraproject.org
On Saturday, November 20, 2021, 03:16:50 AM CST, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 04:46:17A
On Sat, 2021-11-20 at 04:46 +, Globe Trotter via devel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As the name says, this is a review request for the orphaned package
> oclock. I find that the old spec file from F34 complies without errors
> and so would like to maintain it. But first, I need a review. Could
> someone
On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 04:46:17AM +, Globe Trotter via devel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As the name says, this is a review request for the orphaned package oclock. I
> find that the old spec file from F34 complies without errors and so would
> like to maintain it. But first, I need a review. Could s
Hi,
As the name says, this is a review request for the orphaned package oclock. I
find that the old spec file from F34 complies without errors and so would like
to maintain it. But first, I need a review. Could someone please help review
the package?
Thanks,
aa...@fedoraproject.org.
30 matches
Mail list logo
