On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 17:05 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> Oh your right. Lemme rethink if there is a better way to articulate my
> thoughts. I was searching for a generic way to say, potentially
> disruptive changes to core packages aren't a good fit for NTH. The NTH
> xorg bug#596557 discussed d
On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 12:42 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 11:23 -0400, James Laska wrote:
>
> > > Would it be overkill to put more explicit testing sign-off around NTH
> > > bugs?
> >
> > I don't see why not. I think this topic came up in a previous mail.
> > I'd propose
On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 11:23 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> > Would it be overkill to put more explicit testing sign-off around NTH bugs?
>
> I don't see why not. I think this topic came up in a previous mail.
> I'd propose that NTH bugs must be tested and have appropriate bodhi
> karma for them to
On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 07:12 -0400, John Poelstra wrote:
> Adam Williamson said the following on 10/07/2010 01:24 PM Pacific Time:
> >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/QA:SOP_nth_process_nth_draft
> >>> is a proposed new page which covers the whole nice-to-have review process
> >>> m
On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 07:12 -0400, John Poelstra wrote:
> On the other hand it has taken us a *long* time to get to the place
> where we are today where churn in RC has been reduced to a bare minimum.
> I still subscribe to the theory (realizing some in Fedora don't) that
> every additional c
Adam Williamson said the following on 10/07/2010 01:24 PM Pacific Time:
>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/QA:SOP_nth_process_nth_draft
>>> is a proposed new page which covers the whole nice-to-have review process
>>> much as the above proposed page covers the blocker review process
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 11:07 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> > All of them. They're mostly modifications of existing pages. I'm not
> > quite sure how you get that they look the same, they're very different.
>
> General note ... There are a few broken links on this page. I didn't
> inspect *all* of t
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 12:32 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 14:58 -0400, John Poelstra wrote:
> > Adam Williamson said the following on 10/06/2010 01:32 PM Pacific Time:
> > > On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 12:58 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > >> Hi, everyone. So we partly used the
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 14:58 -0400, John Poelstra wrote:
> Adam Williamson said the following on 10/06/2010 01:32 PM Pacific Time:
> > On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 12:58 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >> Hi, everyone. So we partly used the proposed new nice-to-have bug
> >> tracking system during the F14
Adam Williamson said the following on 10/06/2010 01:32 PM Pacific Time:
> On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 12:58 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> Hi, everyone. So we partly used the proposed new nice-to-have bug
>> tracking system during the F14 Beta process, and it seemed to go well.
>> In a quick burst of a
On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 12:58 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi, everyone. So we partly used the proposed new nice-to-have bug
> tracking system during the F14 Beta process, and it seemed to go well.
> In a quick burst of airport productivity, I've quickly written up a
> bunch of proposed new wiki p
On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 16:22 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> > In practice this is a formalization of existing procedure - until F14
> > Beta, QA and releng did much the same process but entirely informally,
> > we just kept lists of bugs we'd take fixes for either in our heads or in
> > the RC creatio
On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 12:58 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi, everyone. So we partly used the proposed new nice-to-have bug
> tracking system during the F14 Beta process, and it seemed to go well.
> In a quick burst of airport productivity, I've quickly written up a
> bunch of proposed new wiki p
Hi, everyone. So we partly used the proposed new nice-to-have bug
tracking system during the F14 Beta process, and it seemed to go well.
In a quick burst of airport productivity, I've quickly written up a
bunch of proposed new wiki pages and modifications to existing ones to
document the nice-to-ha
14 matches
Mail list logo
