Hi folks,
The deps are all packaged so datalad is also up for review now:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2002848
Happy to swap reviews, as always :)
It's an awesome tool for use in scientific (and other) work. Here's the
handbook for a quick glance:
http://handbook.datalad.org/en/la
Hi
On 27.07.21 22:50, Major Hayden wrote:
python-azure-appconfiguration (required SDK component)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981573
python-azure-devtools (for testing the Azure CLI/SDK)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1986414
python-azure-mgmt-insights (
Hey folks,
Thanks to everyone who helped with package reviews and guidance as I
cobbled together the Azure CLI and SDK packages. The work is almost
complete!
There are a few remaining packages left to review:
python-azure-appconfiguration (required SDK component)
https://bugzilla.redhat.
I’d like to get python-xds-protos
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980041) reviewed so I can
update grpc to version 1.39.0 in Rawhide in time for Fedora 35.
This is a new dependency for grpc—a weirdly circular one that’s
ultimately generated from sources inside grpc, but is separa
Looks like python-userpath exists already, albeit for rawhide only.
I'd like to review pipx (this will be my first review). If you could in
turn review mopidy-mpd, that would be greatly appreciated.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1792086
_
Hello,
I have two packages for a review swap - they should be fairly
straightforward. python3-userpath is a python module for manipulating
the $PATH variable for several shells; also it is a dependency of pipx :
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1790232
pipx is a tool for installi
On 6/2/2018 1:34 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The linux-igd package no longer builds against the latest libupnp
> package and upstream is dead so I'm going to retire it.
>
> To replace it I am packaging miniupnpd, which is strangely not in
> Fedora while the client tool, miniupnpc,
Hi all,
The linux-igd package no longer builds against the latest libupnp package and
upstream is dead so I'm going to retire it.
To replace it I am packaging miniupnpd, which is strangely not in Fedora while the
client tool, miniupnpc, is packaged.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?
On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 10:40 AM Michael Cronenworth
wrote:
> Hello,
> Wine 3.9 has introduced a dependency on a new library for Direct3D 12
functionality.
> I'd like to get this package review ASAP. Please share a review you would
like to swap.
> vkd3d - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cg
Hello,
Wine 3.9 has introduced a dependency on a new library for Direct3D 12 functionality.
I'd like to get this package review ASAP. Please share a review you would like to swap.
vkd3d - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582861
Thanks,
Michael
_
>>
>> So I did commented in comment 7 this March. However, there is no update
>> till now. I dropped an email to packaging list[2] just now and Tomas
>> suggest me to ask for a review swap request.
>
> Zamir,
>
> open a new bug, and close #1062808 as the duplicate of
; till now. I dropped an email to packaging list[2] just now and Tomas
> suggest me to ask for a review swap request.
Zamir,
open a new bug, and close #1062808 as the duplicate of the new one.
Package review bugs are always tied to the name of the ori
review swap request.
So I am writing to see if anyone can help me with the process.
Thanks!
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062808
[2]
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packag...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/QXKAKW72B73CGBJHHUATW6SMP2F2XORK/?sort=date
--
Ziqian SUN
Hello all,
I would like to request a review for the OpenShift Origin package
and would be happy to review someone else's package in return.
origin - OpenShift Open Source Container Management by Red Hat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287822
Thank you,
-AdamM
--
devel mailing
On 28/11/15 17:12, Mattia Verga wrote:
This is a quite simple review:
kpmcore https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285042
I can take another package to swap reviews, but I'm not a sponsor.
I've taken it, if you wouldn't mind looking at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231
This is a quite simple review:
kpmcore https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285042
I can take another package to swap reviews, but I'm not a sponsor.
Thanks
Mattia
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi Adam,
Take!
Please, can you take this for me
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1240126 ?
Thanks in advance
Regards
- gil
Il 25/11/2015 22:02, Adam Goode ha scritto:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279660
This is a pre-req for packaging https://github.com/google/cups-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279660
This is a pre-req for packaging https://github.com/google/cups-connector
Happy to take a package to review. Note that I am not a sponsor.
Thanks,
Adam
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/li
Hello:
I want to bring back cairo-dock back to Fedora, which was removed on
Feb 2009 from Fedora and need re-review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178911 cairo-dock
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178912 cairo-dock-plug-ins
cairo-dock-plug-ins depends on cairo-dock.
I
On Aug 23, 2013 6:00 PM, "T.C. Hollingsworth"
wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> Would someone be willing to trade me a review for:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997678
>
> It's dead simple at the moment: it just provides a couple directories and
RPM
> macros. Later on it will grow some httpd mag
Hi!
Would someone be willing to trade me a review for:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997678
It's dead simple at the moment: it just provides a couple directories and RPM
macros. Later on it will grow some httpd magic but that's on hold until Fedora
21 since we're still sorting that
Hi Ralph,
I've taken this one and will review it before EOD.
On Wed, 2013-02-27 at 11:13 -0500, Ralph Bean wrote:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907688
Could you please review either
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912048 - "mpDris2"
or
https://bugzilla.redh
I'm working on the unbundling effort for python-requests. One
stepping stone in that path is the following review request (for which
I am soliciting potential reviewers):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907688
That one is the highest priority, but there are a few other reviews I'
Hello,
Anyone interested in swapping package reviews?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853252
Thanks in advance-
-Ralph
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 10:44 AM, William Cohen wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am trying to clean up the papi package. The papi package currently bundles
> the libpfm sources with in it. I would like to split libpfm out into a
> separate package to follow the Fedora packaging guidelines. There have been
Hi All,
I am trying to clean up the papi package. The papi package currently bundles
the libpfm sources with in it. I would like to split libpfm out into a separate
package to follow the Fedora packaging guidelines. There have been some
comments on package in the bz, but need to get the libpfm
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>> lzip just split out lziprecover. If someone would be so kind as to do
>> this quick review, I'll take one in return.
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803018
>
> I'll take
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> lzip just split out lziprecover. If someone would be so kind as to do
> this quick review, I'll take one in return.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803018
I'll take it.
Here's my only open review for Fedora:
https://bugzilla.r
lzip just split out lziprecover. If someone would be so kind as to do
this quick review, I'll take one in return.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803018
Thanks!
--
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject
I'm ready to swap on any from my packages awaiting review.
I going to reviewing now.
24.08.2011 00:58, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> Dear contributors,
>
> Is anyone interested in some review swaps? These packages should be
> quite straightforward:
>
> moonscript -- moonscript is to Lua what cof
Dear contributors,
Is anyone interested in some review swaps? These packages should be
quite straightforward:
moonscript -- moonscript is to Lua what coffeescript is to Javascript
(improved syntax, lots of convenience features -- from
for-comprehensions to OOP)
You need to recompile lua-filesy
On 04/06/2011 02:53 AM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 06.04.2011, 02:11 +0200 schrieb Michel Alexandre Salim:
>
>> These are part of the Elementary OS project, and were recently
>> featured in OMG Ubuntu:
>> Dexter --
>> http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2010/12/meet-dexter-elementarys-new-a
Am Mittwoch, den 06.04.2011, 02:11 +0200 schrieb Michel Alexandre Salim:
> These are part of the Elementary OS project, and were recently
> featured in OMG Ubuntu:
> Dexter --
> http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2010/12/meet-dexter-elementarys-new-address-book-app/
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bu
On 04/06/2011 05:41 AM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a couple of review requests, one depending on the other, that
> I'd like to swap with:
>
> These are part of the Elementary OS project, and were recently
> featured in OMG Ubuntu:
> Dexter --
> http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/20
Hi all,
I have a couple of review requests, one depending on the other, that
I'd like to swap with:
These are part of the Elementary OS project, and were recently
featured in OMG Ubuntu:
Dexter --
http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2010/12/meet-dexter-elementarys-new-address-book-app/
https://bugzilla
Hi all,
I created a package for iceplayer.
It is a nice simple player. It supports Lyrics and many formats (a
backend of GStreamer).
Developers will add i18n and l10n later (they are working, until now,
just Chinese).
The Review Request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688183
The home
Hi all,
Yorba, the company that develops our current default photo management
tool (Shotwell), finally released an updated version of Valencia, a
gedit Vala development environment, a few months back. We've had this
package in our review queue for a lot longer, and unfortunately the
review got sta
37 matches
Mail list logo
