On 11/11/2012 10:01 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 11/06/2012 06:07 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
Oh no, you are top posting again ;-)
And please, please, please could we trim quotes to relevant ones? Thanks!
Ohmahgerd, thank you for saying that. I am all for bottom posting but
the _reason_
On 11/06/2012 06:07 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
Oh no, you are top posting again ;-)
And please, please, please could we trim quotes to relevant ones? Thanks!
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702
Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Come on, there are the same alarmist who think that Wikipedia will be
> hijacked and destroyed but have it happened any time?
Edit wars often break out on Wikipedia. That's not something I would
like to see in Fedora.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Lamest_edit_wars
A
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2012 2:56:18 PM
Subject: Re: Revamping the non responsive maintainer process
So give me the permission [1] as well as the others who requested it
before me.
Apparently the current owner doesn't care. You can compare the
version
his
On Wed, 2012-11-07 at 10:12 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 7.11.2012 10:00, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
> > On Wed, 2012-11-07 at 09:49 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >> You are still maintainer, you are still owner and you are notified by
> >> email about every change in your package, so you'll be
, November 6, 2012 2:56:18 PM
Subject: Re: Revamping the non responsive maintainer process
So give me the permission [1] as well as the others who requested it
before me.
Apparently the current owner doesn't care. You can compare the
version
history in koji [2] and [3] and if he doesn&#
Dne 7.11.2012 10:00, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
On Wed, 2012-11-07 at 09:49 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
You are still maintainer, you are still owner and you are notified by
email about every change in your package, so you'll be able to catch
such activity pretty soon and act accordingly.
To b
Dne 7.11.2012 09:52, Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 6.11.2012 16:40, Marcela Mašláňová napsal(a):
On 11/06/2012 04:32 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 11/06/2012 01:07 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
Oh no, you are top posting again ;-)
Could you create fesco ticket for this package? I proposed
On Wed, 2012-11-07 at 09:49 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> You are still maintainer, you are still owner and you are notified by
> email about every change in your package, so you'll be able to catch
> such activity pretty soon and act accordingly.
To be the devil's advocate, you do get the emai
Dne 6.11.2012 16:40, Marcela Mašláňová napsal(a):
On 11/06/2012 04:32 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 11/06/2012 01:07 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
Oh no, you are top posting again ;-)
Could you create fesco ticket for this package? I proposed usage of
the script in Johann's ticket
https
Revamping the non responsive maintainer process
So give me the permission [1] as well as the others who requested it
before me.
Apparently the current owner doesn't care. You can compare the
version
history in koji [2] and [3] and if he doesn't care about one package,
it
is reasonable to
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 16:04:39 +0100,
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
When I do not react upon requests, I usually either missed or forgot
about the request or deliberately do not yet want to approve.
That said, what I feel is missing in Fedora's pkgdb web-forms is an
option to "leave a comment to
On 11/06/2012 04:32 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 11/06/2012 01:07 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
Oh no, you are top posting again ;-)
Could you create fesco ticket for this package? I proposed usage of
the script in Johann's ticket
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/967#comment:7 Imho
On 11/06/2012 01:07 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
Oh no, you are top posting again ;-)
Could you create fesco ticket for this package? I proposed usage of
the script in Johann's ticket
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/967#comment:7 Imho it might be
better to give acl to more people, then
On 11/06/2012 02:24 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 6.11.2012 14:17, Aleksandar Kurtakov napsal(a):
- Original Message -
From: "Vít Ondruch"
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2012 2:56:18 PM
Subject: Re: Revamping the non responsive maintainer process
Dne 6.11.2012 14:17, Aleksandar Kurtakov napsal(a):
- Original Message -
From: "Vít Ondruch"
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2012 2:56:18 PM
Subject: Re: Revamping the non responsive maintainer process
So give me the permission [1] as well as
- Original Message -
> From: "Vít Ondruch"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2012 2:56:18 PM
> Subject: Re: Revamping the non responsive maintainer process
>
> So give me the permission [1] as well as the others who requested it
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
- Original Message -
From: "Vít Ondruch"
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2012 12:55:27 PM
Subject: Re: Revamping the non responsive maintainer process
I don't know what are you reading in my response, but I definitely
- Original Message -
From: "Vít Ondruch"
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2012 12:55:27 PM
Subject: Re: Revamping the non responsive maintainer process
I don't know what are you reading in my response, but I definitely
did
not propose anything lik
Is it really that hard for you people to follow our mailing list
guidelines[1]?
JBG
1.https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines#If_You_Are_Replying_to_a_Message
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Original Message -
From: "Vít Ondruch"
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2012 10:28:11 AM
Subject: Re: Revamping the non responsive maintainer process
Dne 5.11.2012 10:22, Marcela Mašláňová napsal(a):
On 11/02/2012 06:57 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote
@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2012 12:55:27 PM
> Subject: Re: Revamping the non responsive maintainer process
>
> I don't know what are you reading in my response, but I definitely
> did
> not propose anything like "noone wants people that are re
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2012 10:28:11 AM
Subject: Re: Revamping the non responsive maintainer process
Dne 5.11.2012 10:22, Marcela Mašláňová napsal(a):
On 11/02/2012 06:57 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 11/02/2012 04:56 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On F
team
- Original Message -
> From: "Vít Ondruch"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2012 10:28:11 AM
> Subject: Re: Revamping the non responsive maintainer process
>
> Dne 5.11.2012 10:22, Marcela Mašláňová napsal(a):
> > On 11/02/2012
Dne 5.11.2012 10:22, Marcela Mašláňová napsal(a):
On 11/02/2012 06:57 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 11/02/2012 04:56 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 16:44:06 +
"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 11/02/2012 04:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
=?UTF-8?B?IkrDs2hhbm4gQi4gR3XDsG11bmR
On 11/05/2012 09:22 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
You are using your use-case for everyone. If you insist on automatic
process, then the metric should work with more data.
It's good that we elected FESCO to find out and decide which appropriate
metric data should be used to determine that...
On 11/02/2012 06:57 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 11/02/2012 04:56 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 16:44:06 +
"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 11/02/2012 04:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
=?UTF-8?B?IkrDs2hhbm4gQi4gR3XDsG11bmRzc29uIg==?=
writes:
On 11/02/2012 03:32 PM, Matth
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 06:12:02PM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 11/02/2012 06:05 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> >
> >No, they might simply have had nothing to do. Sometimes
> >applications are stable, have no releases, and have no bugs files
> >against them.
>
>
>
> Then those individual
- Original Message -
> From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Friday, November 2, 2012 9:20:05 PM
> Subject: Re: Revamping the non responsive maintainer process
>
> On 11/02/2012 06:27 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> >
Once upon a time, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" said:
> Surely if an individual has not logged into for several months into our
> infrastructure he must be inactive no?
I maintain just a couple of low-overhead packages, and I haven't changed
either in a couple of years. The only time I've logged into
On 11/02/2012 06:27 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
Wrong. Do you know how few of the problems we see in Eclipse land don't need
fixes upstreams? And some of these issues require man/months (years sometimes)
upstream before there is smth to show in Fedora. Don't make your assumptions
based on t
- Original Message -
> From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Friday, November 2, 2012 7:57:57 PM
> Subject: Re: Revamping the non responsive maintainer process
>
> On 11/02/2012 04:56 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
On 11/02/2012 06:05 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
No, they might simply have had nothing to do. Sometimes applications
are stable, have no releases, and have no bugs files against them.
Then those individuals would simply respond to the email that that was
the case and they are still alive and ac
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 12:57 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 11/02/2012 04:56 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 16:44:06 +
>> "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>>
>> On 11/02/2012 04:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>>
=?UTF-8?B?**IkrDs2hhbm4gQi4gR3XDsG11bmRzc2**9uIg==?=
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 17:57:57 +,
"\"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson\"" wrote:
Surely if an individual has not logged into for several months into
our infrastructure he must be inactive no?
Not necessarily. You can watch things without having to login to
infrastructure. Unless you need to mak
On 11/02/2012 04:56 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 16:44:06 +
"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 11/02/2012 04:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
=?UTF-8?B?IkrDs2hhbm4gQi4gR3XDsG11bmRzc29uIg==?=
writes:
On 11/02/2012 03:32 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 03:12:56PM +00
On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 16:44:06 +
"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 11/02/2012 04:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > =?UTF-8?B?IkrDs2hhbm4gQi4gR3XDsG11bmRzc29uIg==?=
> > writes:
> >> On 11/02/2012 03:32 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 03:12:56PM +, "Jóhann B.
> >>> Guðmu
37 matches
Mail list logo
