On Tue, 12 May 2020 at 14:13, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> > - Do we have a documented way to mark modules as orphaned or retired?
>
> I think we do. I seem to remember seeing "dead.module" files in some
> module repositories I looked at ...
Well, the "dead.package" file in dist git has been the st
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 9:14 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 02:51:03PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 12. 05. 20 8:49, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > > Finally, does everyone agree about the original request: "remove all
> > > maintainers
> > > of retired packages"? Or
On Tue, 2020-05-12 at 16:19 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 03:13:42PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 02:51:03PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > On 12. 05. 20 8:49, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > > > Finally, does everyone agree about the original r
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 03:13:42PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 02:51:03PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 12. 05. 20 8:49, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > > Finally, does everyone agree about the original request: "remove all
> > > maintainers
> > > of retired packag
Dne 12. 05. 20 v 20:26 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> Dne 12. 05. 20 v 14:51 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
>> On 12. 05. 20 8:49, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>>> Finally, does everyone agree about the original request: "remove all
>>> maintainers
>>> of retired packages"? Or should we bring this to FESCo?
>> If
Dne 12. 05. 20 v 14:51 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
> On 12. 05. 20 8:49, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>> Finally, does everyone agree about the original request: "remove all
>> maintainers
>> of retired packages"? Or should we bring this to FESCo?
>
> If the procedure is "remove all maintainers if all br
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 02:51:03PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 12. 05. 20 8:49, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > Finally, does everyone agree about the original request: "remove all
> > maintainers
> > of retired packages"? Or should we bring this to FESCo?
>
> If the procedure is "remove all ma
On 12. 05. 20 8:49, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
Finally, does everyone agree about the original request: "remove all maintainers
of retired packages"? Or should we bring this to FESCo?
If the procedure is "remove all maintainers if all branches are retired or EOL"
than yes, this is a good thing.
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 02:08:12PM +0200, Igor Raits wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On Tue, 2020-05-12 at 08:49 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > Good Morning Everyone,
> >
> > A little while ago we have received the request on the infra issue
> > tracker to
> >
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 2:03 PM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
> Good Morning Everyone,
>
> A little while ago we have received the request on the infra issue tracker to
> remove all maintainers of retired packages [1].
>
> So today I decided to look at what this would look like and wrote a script
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Tue, 2020-05-12 at 08:49 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> Good Morning Everyone,
>
> A little while ago we have received the request on the infra issue
> tracker to
> remove all maintainers of retired packages [1].
>
> So today I decided to lo
Good Morning Everyone,
A little while ago we have received the request on the infra issue tracker to
remove all maintainers of retired packages [1].
So today I decided to look at what this would look like and wrote a script that
queries PDC for the list of all branches on all projects [2], gather
12 matches
Mail list logo
