Re: Request for exception to non-responsive maintainer policy for Sugar packages

2021-02-08 Thread Peter Robinson
On Sun, Feb 7, 2021 at 6:28 PM Alex Perez wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > I've opened https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2574 to facilitate assumption > ownership of the Sugar packages in Fedora, most of which are de-facto > abandoned by the previous maintainer, erikos, who has not authenticated with >

Re: Request for exception to non-responsive maintainer policy for Sugar packages

2021-02-07 Thread Dan Čermák
Hi Alex, I agree that in these cases an immediate orphaning of the packages is justified, as the packager in question is clearly no longer active. You might want to ask a provenpackager to push your fix directly to dist got though, to get the changes in place in time. Cheers, Dan On Februar

Request for exception to non-responsive maintainer policy for Sugar packages

2021-02-07 Thread Alex Perez
Hi folks,   I've opened https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2574 [https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2574] to facilitate assumption ownership of the Sugar packages in Fedora, most of which are de-facto abandoned by the previous maintainer, erikos, who has not authenticated with his FAS account since March