On 01/18/2012 10:42 PM, BJ Dierkes wrote:
Sorry, I didn't mean to start a heated thread on SysV vs. Systemd or anything.
Unfortunately my question wasn't really answered. I*am* removing SysV support
from gearmand … and have already implemented Systemd scripts. My question is… for
existing
On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 16:42 -0600, BJ Dierkes wrote:
> My question is… for existing users still on SysV in Fedora < 17 …. are
> there any safeguards I need to put in place as to not break them… or
> should I just rip out all the SysV stuff and hope for the best?
I read that shouldn't or not allow
Hi,
On 18/01/12 22:42, BJ Dierkes wrote:
Sorry, I didn't mean to start a heated thread on SysV vs. Systemd or anything.
Unfortunately my question wasn't really answered. I *am* removing SysV support
from gearmand … and have already implemented Systemd scripts. My question is… for
existing
Sorry, I didn't mean to start a heated thread on SysV vs. Systemd or anything.
Unfortunately my question wasn't really answered. I *am* removing SysV support
from gearmand … and have already implemented Systemd scripts. My question is…
for existing users still on SysV in Fedora < 17 …. are th
> > what about looking at existing ones?
> > no,, it takes some minutes for 90% of all services
> >
> > If you believe so, file patches
>
> well, attached are the one i am using with F15
> most of them written by myself or derived
> from F16/F17 packages
>
> CAUTION: they are from mixed
On Sat, 2012-01-14 at 18:59 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 14.01.2012 18:26, schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 6:03 AM, Reindl Harald
> >
> > Am 14.01.2012 01:17, schrieb Sérgio Basto:
> > > On Sat, 2012-01-14 at 00:32 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 11:29 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> well, attached are the one i am using with F15
> most of them written by myself or derived
> from F16/F17 packages
>
You have to seperate them out and file them in bugzilla if you want them to
reach the maintainers. Very few people are g
Am 14.01.2012 18:26, schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 6:03 AM, Reindl Harald
>
> Am 14.01.2012 01:17, schrieb Sérgio Basto:
> > On Sat, 2012-01-14 at 00:32 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >>
> >> what exactly is the problem to convert a existing
> >> sys
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 6:03 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 14.01.2012 01:17, schrieb Sérgio Basto:
> > On Sat, 2012-01-14 at 00:32 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >>
> >> what exactly is the problem to convert a existing
> >> sysv-init script to a systemd-unit
> >
> > I don't know convert ? , to
Am 14.01.2012 01:17, schrieb Sérgio Basto:
> On Sat, 2012-01-14 at 00:32 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> what exactly is the problem to convert a existing
>> sysv-init script to a systemd-unit
>
> I don't know convert ? , took hours ?
what about looking at existing ones?
no,, it takes some
On Sat, 2012-01-14 at 00:32 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> what exactly is the problem to convert a existing
> sysv-init script to a systemd-unit
I don't know convert ? , took hours ?
I don't have time to understand how systemd works , have you any magic
script to covert it ? or o quick todo ?
Am 14.01.2012 00:27, schrieb Sérgio Basto:
> On Fri, 2012-01-13 at 22:51 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>> I'm not so sure how you figure out that this bug is not valid and how
>> you come to the conclusion that it's not a requirement to switch to
>> native systemd units and still shipping
On Fri, 2012-01-13 at 22:51 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> I'm not so sure how you figure out that this bug is not valid and how
> you come to the conclusion that it's not a requirement to switch to
> native systemd units and still shipping legacy sysv init script is
> already considered o
On 01/13/2012 10:39 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
I'm sure someone will correct me if I mis-speak, but I don't think
your bug is currently valid. There's currently no requirement that you
convert to systemd, although I would highly recommend it. There was
some talk about forcing conversion at some poin
Am 13.01.2012 23:39, schrieb Richard Shaw:
> I'm sure someone will correct me if I mis-speak, but I don't think
> your bug is currently valid. There's currently no requirement that you
> convert to systemd, although I would highly recommend it. There was
> some talk about forcing conversion at so
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 3:31 PM, BJ Dierkes
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have this bug open:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=781451
>
>
> And so, I am needing to remove my sysvinit scripts from gourmand in rawhide.
> I've read the docs on SysVInit Scripts and Systemd but haven't found a
Hello,
I have this bug open:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=781451
And so, I am needing to remove my sysvinit scripts from gourmand in rawhide.
I've read the docs on SysVInit Scripts and Systemd but haven't found an answer…
How should I handle removing the init script? Should
17 matches
Mail list logo
